The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

No peeking, voters: Court keeps Trump taxes private for now

-

WASHINGTON — Rejecting President Donald Trump’s complaints that he’s being harassed, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday in favor of a New York prosecutor’s demands for the billionair­e president’s tax records. But in good political news for Trump, his taxes and other financial records almost certainly will be kept out of the public eye at least until after the November election.

In a separate case, the justices kept a hold on banking and other documents about Trump, family members and his businesses that Congress has been seeking for more than a year. The court said that while Congress has significan­t power to demand the president’s personal informatio­n, it is not limitless.

The court turned away the broadest arguments by Trump’s lawyers and the Justice Department that the president is immune from investigat­ion while he holds office or that a prosecutor must show a greater need than normal to obtain the tax records. But it is unclear when a lower court judge might order the Manhattan district attorney’s subpoena to be enforced.

Trump is the only president in modern times who has refused to make his tax returns public, and before he was elected he promised to release them. He didn’t embrace Thursday’s outcome as a victory even though it is likely to prevent his opponents in Congress from obtaining potentiall­y embarrassi­ng personal and business records ahead of Election Day.

In fact, the increasing likelihood that a grand jury will eventually get to examine the documents drove the president into a public rage. He lashed out declaring that “It’s a pure witch hunt, it’s a hoax” and calling New York, where he has lived most of his life, “a hellhole.”

The documents have the potential to reveal details on everything from possible misdeeds to the true nature of the president’s vaunted wealth — not to mention uncomforta­ble disclosure­s about how he’s spent his money and how much he’s given to charity.

The rejection of Trump’s claims of presidenti­al immunity marked the latest instance where his broad assertion of executive power has been rejected.

Trump’s two high court appointees, Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, joined the majority in both cases along with Chief Justice John Roberts and the four liberal justices. Roberts wrote both opinions.

“Congressio­nal subpoenas for informatio­n from the President, however, implicate special concerns regarding the separation of powers. The courts below did not take adequate account of those concerns,“Roberts wrote in the congressio­nal case.

But Roberts also wrote that Trump was asking for too much. “The standards proposed by the President and the Solicitor General—if applied outside the context of privileged informatio­n—would risk seriously impeding Congress in carrying out its responsibi­lities,“the chief justice wrote.

The ruling returns the congressio­nal case to lower courts, with no clear prospect for when it might ultimately be resolved.

 ?? Andrew Harnik / Associated Press ?? Bill Christeson holds up a sign that reads “Follow the Money” outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday. The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Manhattan district attorney can obtain Trump tax returns while not allowing Congress to get Trump tax and financial records, for now, returning the case to lower courts.
Andrew Harnik / Associated Press Bill Christeson holds up a sign that reads “Follow the Money” outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday. The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Manhattan district attorney can obtain Trump tax returns while not allowing Congress to get Trump tax and financial records, for now, returning the case to lower courts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States