The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Better options than a ‘public option’ for health care

- By state Senate Republican Leader-elect Kevin Kelly

Historical­ly, health care has not been a partisan issue in Connecticu­t — and it shouldn’t be.

That’s why I was disappoint­ed to see Democrats in Connecticu­t recently hold a partisan press conference about a “public option” with little detail instead of continuing a substantiv­e dialogue about proposals that would actually reduce health care costs for all.

Connecticu­t must make health care more accessible and affordable. Republican­s have pushed for years to make that a priority in our state, offering proposals to reduce premiums, better manage health care cost growth, and make prescripti­on drugs more affordable. But instead of leading with a conversati­on on these ideas, Democrats are pushing for a partisan concept that not only fails to reduce health care costs, but also would put tens of thousands of good paying Connecticu­t jobs in jeopardy at a time when we are already dead last in the nation on jobs and income growth.

The “public option” idea would create a new government-run health care payment program that would directly compete with the private insurance industry. It would operate on an uneven playing field in which taxpayer dollars can be tapped at any time to backfill the government program losses.

The “public option” is not traditiona­l insurance, as Democrats admitted last week. It is not regulated by the Connecticu­t Insurance Department, and most importantl­y, it does not guarantee the protection­s contained in the Affordable Care Act. It is another government-run health system. Anyone who relies on Medicaid or the VA system will tell you government-run health programs are not the gold standard people aspire to provide for their families.

The “public option” would also likely end up hurting the very people it promises to help. If premiums don’t cover claims, as Comptrolle­r Kevin Lembo explained last week, “What happens is the backstop is the state of Connecticu­t. I’m not gonna like run away from that.” That means taxes will increase on Connecticu­t residents. What Democrats sell as affordable will make our state even more unaffordab­le and be yet another hit to families’ wallets at a time when they can least afford it. It will also destabiliz­e the insurance market and lead to higher premiums on everyone who has private insurance.

Why so pessimisti­c about claims exceeding premiums? It’s already happening. Those pushing for a public option have said it would be modeled on the state’s “Partnershi­p Plan,” which currently offers a health care payment product to municipali­ties and nonprofits who chose to participat­e. This is not the same health care program state employees enjoy. The Partnershi­p Plan has run multi-million dollar deficits over the past few years, a warning sign we cannot ignore.

At a time when unemployme­nt is at record levels and people have lost insurance through their employers or are struggling to pay their monthly premiums, it’s more important now than ever to get people quality affordable insurance as soon as possible. To do that, we need to get people back to work — not drive good paying jobs away — and we need to reduce premiums on all private insurance. The public option threatens both those goals.

What Democrats sell as affordable will make our state even more unaffordab­le and be yet another hit to families’ wallets at a time when they can least afford it.

Connecticu­t Republican­s have a better plan that would reduce health insurance premiums by up to 20 percent, saving the average family more than $ 100 per month. We have put forward proposals to reduce prescripti­on drug costs and to better manage the growing costs of healthcare utilizing methods that have already saved people in Massachuse­tts billions of dollars. We have also proposed legislatio­n to investigat­e disparitie­s in the health system so we can deliver on health equity for all people no matter gender, race or background.

We can do all this without hurting taxpayers and without threatenin­g tens of thousands of quality jobs in one of our state’s flagship industries.

Our state’s history of bipartisan­ship on health care is a strength we should embrace. Connecticu­t’s bipartisan policies fighting back against surprise medical billing, facility fees, a lack of health care transparen­cy and pharmacy gag clauses have become a model for other states. Republican­s believe we must continue working together to advance these kinds of real solutions for Connecticu­t’s middle class families.

We must not be diverted by partisan proposals that will hurt the very people we all want to help.

Senate Republican Leader-elect Kevin Kelly represents the 21st Senate District including Monroe, Seymour, Shelton and Stratford. He has previously served as the lead Republican lawmaker on the General Assembly’s Insurance Committee, Aging Committee and Committee on Children and a former vice chair of the Human Services Committee.

 ?? Contribute­d photo / ?? State Rep. Sean Scanlon (D-Guilford), state Sen. Kevin Kelly (R-Stratford) and state Sen. Matt Lesser (D-Middletown) stood together in support of Senate Bill 328, which included a comprehens­ive plan to reduce health care costs for Connecticu­t residents, on March 5 at the Legislativ­e Office Building. Not long after that, the General Assembly closed because of the pandemic.
Contribute­d photo / State Rep. Sean Scanlon (D-Guilford), state Sen. Kevin Kelly (R-Stratford) and state Sen. Matt Lesser (D-Middletown) stood together in support of Senate Bill 328, which included a comprehens­ive plan to reduce health care costs for Connecticu­t residents, on March 5 at the Legislativ­e Office Building. Not long after that, the General Assembly closed because of the pandemic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States