The Middletown Press (Middletown, CT)

Probe: DCF monitoring ‘inadequate’

Review of children’s deaths finds agency lacks safety planning in high-risk cases

- By Lisa Backus

“What we’re talking about is transparen­cy and accountabi­lity of one of the government’s most important functions, the care of children.” Child Advocate Sarah Eagan

An investigat­ion following the death of a Connecticu­t baby from fentanyl poisoning has determined the state Department of Children and Families lacks adequate safety planning, public transparen­cy and documentat­ion in moderate and high-risk cases, according to a report released Thursday.

The state Office of the Child Advocate’s investigat­ion also determined that 24 percent of the 99 Connecticu­t infants and toddlers who died in the past three years from preventabl­e causes had been involved with DCF and the agency often covered up or omitted important informatio­n on its practices when publicly speaking about deaths, the report showed.

“What we’re talking about is transparen­cy and accountabi­lity of one the government’s most important functions, the care of children,” Child Advocate Sarah Eagan said. “There has to be a framework on what they are doing to sustain and improve policies for children and you have to be open with the public about what’s going right and what’s going wrong.”

Based on her findings, Eagan is calling for DCF to engage in quality assurance

reviews of its safety plans, regular public reporting of its safety practices and child fatalities and a public hearing to discuss more treatment options and supports for families under the agency’s purview.

“Inconsiste­ncies in practice or lack of access to needed services increase the risk of poor, or even catastroph­ic outcomes, including preventabl­e injuries or unnecessar­y and traumatic removals of children into foster care,” Eagan wrote in a 15-page letter to DCF outlining the findings of the investigat­ion.

“Keeping young children home with their parents requires vigilant attention to high-quality as

sessments, effective safety planning and timely service deliid he stanvery to these high-need families.”

Michael C. Williams, DCF’s deputy commission­er of operations, questioned the timing of the letter, saying it would’ve been more helpful when the incident occurred last year. Since the child’s death, he said, the agency has evolved in handling cases involving substance abuse treatment.

“The contents of the report really don’t speak to the actual casework, the family work, the substance abuse work and issues like that,” he said. “It sounds like what she’s asking for in this letter is some reporting that we make public to her and the public around the outcome of our [quality improvemen­t] work, nothing instructiv­e about our practice on casework.”

In terms of a publicly available analysis of these improvemen­ts, Williams said the agency has been working toward a dashboard that shows “key performanc­e indicators” for a few years now and the agency is in the middle of upgrading its IT system.

“We can only go as fast as we have the people with the expertise and the technology to develop it,” he said. “It’s not a resistance, and this notion that I saw in her that we were hiding things, that I take complete exception against. We don’t hide anything; it’s just our capacity to do certain things are hampered because we don’t have the staffing that we need to do it.”

Eagan began examining DCF

safety planning and monitoring practices in March after the death of a 1-year-old girl, Kaylee, in Salem who died from fentanyl poisoning in February 2022 while the child welfare agency was involved with her family.

As part of the investigat­ion, the child advocate also reviewed a case involving another 1-yearold who nearly died of a fentanyl overdose while visiting their mother, who was prohibited from caring for the child alone, according to a DCF safety plan.

The child advocate investigat­ion also included a 4-year-old who died from heart inflammati­on following an infection shortly after DCF had closed his family’s case.

In both of those cases, Eagan pointed to DCF’s lack of monitoring of the safety plans and insufficie­nt in-home intensive treatment options for caregivers or parents who are suffering from substance abuse disorders.

In the case of the 4-year-old, there was no documentat­ion that the family’s situation had improved when they were released from DCF, the agency did not seek legal or clinical consultati­ons and no evaluation­s had been conducted, the report said.

In her letter, Eagan said she has not received reports on DCF’s new safety planning practices, which the agency told her in January was due to “resource limitation­s” and “managerial staff vacancies.”

“It is essential that there be consistent focused reviews of agency safety planning and support for families whose cases, like Kaylee’s, remain open with DCF,” Eagan wrote in the letter. “Given the practice deficienci­es identified ... if resources are limiting DCF’s quality assurance

and public disclosure efforts, then this must be addressed with policymake­rs and appropriat­ors during the budget session.”

As part of the review of Kaylee’s death, Eagan discovered DCF caseworker­s had not made an in-person visit to her family’s home in the two months prior to her death, according to the report. The case and virtual visits conducted by DCF during the pandemic has sparked a proposed law requiring caseworker­s to do in-person home visits.

The Salem house where the child was living was “deplorable” state police said, laden with empty drug baggies, Methadone bottles, food waste covered in flies, 38 baggies containing an unknown powder substance that later tested positive for fentanyl and a trash bin with Captain Morgan whiskey “nips” bottles in the room where the child was sleeping.

A used canister of Narcan, a drug administer­ed to reverse an opioid overdose, was found under the pack-and-play where the baby slept, suggesting someone knew the child was near death, state police said in arrest warrants charging her parents, Ricki Thomas and Travis Schubel, with second-degree manslaught­er.

Thomas had told a DCF caseworker that she was concerned about Schubel’s drug use and erratic behavior during a virtual visit on Jan. 26, 2022, arrest warrants said. The day before that visit, a urine sample he submitted to a treatment provider tested positive for fentanyl, the warrants said. The family missed a scheduled virtual visit on Feb. 2, according to Ken Mysogland, a spokespers­on for DCF.

The caseworker reschedule­d for an in-person visit on Feb. 9, which turned out to be one day after Kaylee had died.

Williams stood by the agency’s work in Kaylee’s case and DCF has implemente­d changes to its training and safety planning since.

“Hindsight is always perfect, but it doesn’t necessaril­y mean things were not done or wrong,” Williams said. “In real-time, our work on this case, we did good work.”

For the month before Kaylee’s death, Williams said the state had been hit particular­ly hard by COVID cases and the child had a medical condition where exposure to the virus could’ve been fatal.

To ensure social workers’ and families’ safety, Williams said the agency worked virtually with families in January 2022.

“The communicat­ion was there, the difference was that it wasn’t in person,” he said.

Kaylee is among eight infants or toddlers who have died of fentanyl poisoning in Connecticu­t since 2020, records show. The children who died were all 2 ½ and younger, according to the child advocate.

DCF and Eagan were notified of all of the deaths, and several others that were considered “near misses,” but the child welfare agency didn’t start to examine how caseworker­s were dealing with caregivers who had substance abuse issues until after Kaylee died, records show.

A review of a random sampling of cases that involved safety planning, including Kaylee’s, led Eagan to conclude that the DCF safety planning practices in high-risk cases and the documentat­ion of them are “inadequate.”

DCF told Eagan in June as part of her investigat­ion that the agency would conduct “ongoing structured” case reviews to monitor improvemen­ts in how caseworker­s provided safety planning and documented their work.

But as of Thursday, Eagan said she had not received any reports from DCF on the reviews and she had not received a written response to her conclusion­s, which she presented to the agency on Feb. 6.

“As part of the OCA’s monitoring and critical incident review, we requested the safety planning quality assurance reports as well as a date regarding DCF’s ‘in-home visitation’ efforts, which DCF had previously reported to OCA, would be reviewed on an ongoing basis to assess the efficacy of the agency’s in-home engagement with children and caregivers,” Eagan said in the report released Thursday.

Eagan said her office has discussed the report with DCF for the past several months and the agency “had an opportunit­y to review a draft and respond.”

The “OCA submitted repeated questions to the Department over the last year regarding how it is conducting quality assurance of safety planning with high-risk infants and toddlers in open cases like Kaylee’s, and how it intends to report to the public regarding the agency’s work,” Eagan said in a statement Thursday. “The questions remain unresolved, and it is OCA’s responsibi­lity to report our findings and accompanyi­ng recommenda­tions to the agency and the public.”

 ?? CTMirror.org ?? Sarah Eagan, the state child advocate
CTMirror.org Sarah Eagan, the state child advocate

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States