Cameras could have many consequences

Much has been said, mostly positive, about installing traffic enforcement cameras, but there are things that haven't been mentioned. One such thing is the possible effect of these "tickets" on an individual's driving record. Are these incidents going on the record as a moving violation? Will they be available to insurance companies to use as a factor in determining premium rates and policy renewability? If so, many of you folks who think this is a great idea may have buyer's remorse later.

Another issue is the type of enforcement planned. I agree that cameras covering traffic lights and stop signs could be a good thing, since there is not much to dispute in those areas — you either stopped or you didn't. When it comes to speed, however, there are many considerations. First, the posted speed limit signs in Connecticut are generally too conservative. And this is not just my personal opinion, I am comparing our state to others I have visited. As a result, most drivers typically drive at least 5 to 10 mph over the posted limit. And other factors also change the speed that would be considered reasonable, such as visibility, time of day, weather conditions, and whether people, especially children, are present in the immediate area.

So what will the criteria be for considering whether or not someone is "speeding"? If these cameras are using very "tight" criteria, someone could rack up violations pretty quickly even though most of us would consider their driving safe and reasonable.

As the old saying goes, be careful what you wish for!

David Page Shelton