The Morning Call (Sunday)

Duo reteams for quality sky time

- By Tomris Laffly

There is something disarming about the joint presence of the ever-bashful Eddie Redmayne and the fiercely charismati­c Felicity Jones that instantly feels wholesome. So when the duo embarks on a hot air balloon adventure in “Wild Rose” director Tom Harper’s “The Aeronauts,” you can’t help but tag along and root for “The Theory of Everything” co-stars. Playing a pair of complement­ary trailblaze­rs that start off on the wrong foot, the duo handin-hand elevates Harper’s 1862set, based-on-a-true-story film, from a flimsy action-adventure to something worth watching on the biggest possible screen, even if it operates on a handful of cliches with little characterb­ased substance to speak of.

Which is why Amazon Studios’ two-week exclusive theatrical window is a curious release strategy for a film whose greatest selling point is the reasonable amount of greenscree­n visual wonder it delivers through a pair of enchanting leads. With his signature amiability (even when his character is being difficult), Redmayne plays real-life scientist James Glaisher, who dreams of a future advanced through the study of meteorolog­y. Jones portrays a well-off widow named Amelia Wren, an idealistic, gifted yet fictional aeronaut who’d rather hover on the edge of the atmosphere than adhere to the typical duties expected of the women of her era.

In a script written by Jack Thorne (who shares story credit with Harper), Wren is a standin for Henry Coxwell, Glaisher’s actual co-aeronaut who, along with the scientist, rose in the air over London and flew up to 37,000 feet in a mission designed to observe and research the weather. While the gender swap is strange in its dismissal of historical accuracy, it works within the context of “The Aeronauts” that sees both parties of the two-hander as physical and intellectu­al equals. And to the film’s credit, the chemistry between the leads doesn’t resolve to a predictabl­e case of romance.

This one risky invention aside, the script unfortunat­ely settles for the bare minimum to define James and Amelia, and steadily loses air when it reaches for melodramat­ic cliches. Tedious and increasing­ly unwelcome flashbacks feel exasperati­ng as they continuall­y interrupt the balloon’s graceful yet perilous glide over London and undercut the tete-a-tete between the leads. Through these choppy glimpses into the past, we learn about James’ lifelong scientific ambitions that haven’t always been popular among his skeptical fellows and get served a brief introducti­on to his father (Tom Courtenay), who battles with a worsening case of dementia. The flashbacks also elucidate Amelia’s reasons to aviate — what’s she to do if not flee to the skies when she still deeply mourns the death of her husband (Vincent Perez) and clashes with her traditiona­l, vocally disapprovi­ng sister Antonia (Phoebe Fox)?

Still, the eventually recordbrea­king expedition gets off to a flying start, with the performati­ve Amelia putting on an entertaini­ng show (involving a dog with a parachute, no less) for the thousands of Londoners who gather around to see the balloon’s liftoff. Though once the journey truly takes its shape, the story only barely forges a believable kinship between the two leads.

And even with the CGI-heavy visual beauty of the skies (enhancing stunts filmed high above ground, and rendered through cinematogr­apher George Steel’s feather-light lens), “The Aeronauts” settles into something airless, begging for some action set pieces to pick up the pace. One that brings to mind scenes from Alfonso Cuarón’s “Gravity” finally arrives, sending Jones — bruised and battered in freezing temperatur­es — into the film’s most exciting sequence. With bare, bleeding hands visibly threatened by frostbite, Amelia climbs to the top of the icy balloon to save the increasing­ly unreliable vehicle from crashing, while a mentally unstable, oxygen-starved James’ life hangs in the balance.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States