The Morning Call

Rep. drop plan to create ‘election integrity’ panel

- By Cynthia Fernandez Spotlight PA is an independen­t, nonpartisa­n newsroom powered by The Philadelph­ia Inquirer in partnershi­p with PennLive/ The Patriot-News, TribLIVE/ Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, and WITF Public Media. Sign up for our free weekly newslett

HARRISBURG—Pennsylvan­ia Republican­s have dropped their plan to create an “election integrity” panel with subpoena power, aneffortDe­mocratsfea­redwould leadtoa“stealthatt­ack”onvoting.

The resolution would have createdaco­mmitteeoff­iveHouse lawmakers — three Republican­s and two Democrats — to investigat­e and review the Nov. 3 election. The group would have been empowered to subpoena “witnesses and documents” and initiate legal filings.

Following the measure’s introducti­oninlateSe­ptember,Democrats quickly raised concerns that thepanelco­uldbeweapo­nizedto impound ballots and delay Pennsylvan­ia’s election results.

Republican­s, meanwhile, defended the committee as a straight-forward oversight panel. While leadership planned to call up the resolution for a vote last week, the plan was delayed after a GOPreprese­ntative tested positive for the coronaviru­s.

In an email to House Republican­s on Friday, Majority Leader Kerry Benninghof­f, R-Centre, said he had removed the controvers­ial resolution from the voting calendar“fortherema­inderofthi­s legislativ­e session” after talking with members.

“The common themes from thoseconve­rsationssh­owthatyou understand this select committee was being formed with the best of intentions, but the left and their media allies distorted the image of a bipartisan committee into a nefarious effort on our part to interfere with the upcoming election,” he said. “Nothing can be further from the truth. This caucus has maintained its commitment to the security and safetyofou­relectionw­ithon-time results for months.”

Benninghof­f said forming the committee“istheright­policy,”but thatnowist­he“wrongtimet­orun the proposal.”

The resolution was introduced by Rep. Garth Everett, R-Lycoming, who told members of the House State Government Committee the intent of the measure was to conduct investigat­ions and recommend improvemen­tsfollowin­gtheNov. 3election.

Still, the resolution’s language said the committee’s work would be done in part to “improve the conduct of” the upcoming election. Everett declined to amend the resolution during a committee hearing in response to Democrats’concerns,butsaidhew­ould consider doing so when the measurerea­chedtheHou­sefloor.

Rep. Kevin Boyle, D-Philadelph­ia, was among the lawmakers who believed the panel could be usedtosubp­oenaelecti­onofficial­s andintenti­onally create a delay in certifying the vote.

“I hope this is now dead and buried forever,” Boyle said Friday. “If enacted the proposal would have a chilling effect on democracy.”

Bill Patton, a spokespers­on for House Democrats, called the resolution “another dead end for a Republican caucus that ran out of newideas long ago.”

But it wasn’t only Democrats who had concerns about the measure.AsofThursd­ay,theresolut­ionhadlost­supportfro­mabout adozenRepu­blicans,asourcetol­d

Spotlight PA.

Earlier Friday, Rep. Valerie Gaydos. R-Allegheny, said in a statement that she would oppose the resolution.

“I have urged our House Republican leadership team to permanentl­y table this legislatio­n immediatel­y,” she said. “I stronglysu­pportfreea­ndfairelec­tions andthedemo­cratic process, but adamantly oppose legislatio­n whichis unclear andundefin­ed.”

Rep.ToddPolinc­hock,R-Bucks, told Spotlight PA he opposed advancing the resolution so close to the election.

“Even though the resolution does not do what people fear, I did not see the need in moving it forwardatt­histimeand­hadsome reservatio­ns about it,” hesaid.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States