The Morning Call

Little value seen in screening

Survey: Employers avoid virus test due to cost, complexity

- By Noam Scheiber

A surge of COVID-19 cases this fall has brought reports of new challenges in getting coronaviru­s tests. But for employers, testing availabili­ty and turnaround times do not appear to be the main obstacles.

A survey by Arizona State University and the World Economic Forum, with funding from the Rockefelle­r Foundation, has found that companies most frequently cited cost and complexity as the biggest deterrents to testing their workers.

The findings, based on responses from 1,141 facilities at over 1,100 companies worldwide from September through late October, are consistent with earlier reports suggesting that many employers have been able to obtain testing relatively quickly if they absorb the expense. In many cases, however, employers have indicated that they feel the benefits do not outweigh the costs.

Overall, 17% of the facilities surveyed worldwide said they were testing workers. At least half of those facilities were doing so even for workers without symptoms, and roughly half were testing workers at least once a week.

At facilities that were not testing, only 15% said availabili­ty was an issue, while 28% cited cost, 22% cited complexity and 16% said it would take too long to receive the results. Those surveyed could select more than one reason.

The numbers for the United States, where more than 700 of the facilities were located, were similar to the overall results.

Mara Aspinall, a professor at Arizona State’s College of Health Solutions who helped oversee the study, said the results indicated that companies were figuring out how to get testing done if

it was essential. For the others, she said, there was simply “a lot of confusion and uncertaint­y as to how tests work” in the absence of a national testing strategy, and the potential expense loomed large as well.

Aspinall, who is also an adviser to the Rockefelle­r Foundation, said she thought workplace testing would become far more widespread next year as employers seek to bring more people back to work.

Dr. Raj Behal, chief quality officer of One Medical, which provides primary health care services to large employers like Google, agreed that the lack of cheap tests had played a major role in limiting uptake.

“In our experience, companies that

need to bring their employees in because they are essential or critical workers are regularly screening and testing employees for COVID,” Behal said.

PCR tests, which are generally considered the most accurate but typically require laboratory processing, cost roughly $100 in the United States. Medicare typically covers COVID-19 tests, but many private insurance plans do not.

A spokespers­on for One Medical said the average turnaround time for the tests was two to three days in most markets.

The survey found that companies with 25 workers or fewer were least likely to test, with only 8% doing so.

About 40% of companies with 1,001 to 5,000 workers were testing, as were nearly 60% of companies with over 5,000 workers.

Among the biggest companies that didn’t test, cost was not a commonly cited obstacle. Those companies were much more likely to be discourage­d by the complexity of testing their large workforces, which one-third cited.

Biotechnol­ogy and technology companies were among the most likely to test workers, with 37% and 29% doing so, even as they were also among the most likely to require employees to work remotely.

Only 10% of profession­al services firms, like law practices, said they were testing.

 ?? TAYLOR GLASCOCK/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? A survey found about 40% of firms with 1,001 to 5,000 workers test for COVID-19. Above, a health care worker administer­s a test.
TAYLOR GLASCOCK/THE NEW YORK TIMES A survey found about 40% of firms with 1,001 to 5,000 workers test for COVID-19. Above, a health care worker administer­s a test.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States