The Morning Call

Trump looks past Supreme Court loss to new challenge of results in Pa.

- By Mark Sherman

President Donald Trump on Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to let him join an improbable lawsuit challengin­g election results in Pennsylvan­ia and other states that he lost, a day after the justices rejected a last-gasp bid to reverse Pennsylvan­ia’s certificat­ion of Democrat Joe Biden’s victory.

The high court has asked for responses by Thursday. Out of the roughly 50 lawsuits filed around the country contesting the Nov. 3 vote, Trump has lost more than 35 and the others are pending, according to an Associated Press tally.

The suit from the Texas attorney general, Republican Ken Paxton, demands that the 62 total Electoral College votes in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvan­ia, and Wisconsin be invalidate­d. That’s enough, if set aside, to swing the election to Trump. Paxton’s suit repeats a litany of false, disproven and unsupporte­d allegation­s about mail-in ballots and voting in the four battlegrou­nds.

Repeating many of those claims, Trump lawyer John Eastman wrote, “The fact that nearly half of the country believes the election was stolen should come as no surprise.” Biden won by more than 7 million votes and has a 306-232 electoral vote edge.

“We will be INTERVENIN­G in the Texas (plus many other states) case,” Trump said hours before the high court filing. “This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!”

Legal experts dismissed Paxton’s filing as the latest and perhaps longest legal shot since Election Day, and officials in the four states sharply criticized

Paxton.

“I feel sorry for Texans that their tax dollars are being wasted on such a genuinely embarrassi­ng lawsuit,” Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said.

Seventeen states Trump won last month joined Texas in urging the court to take on the lawsuit less than a week before presidenti­al electors gather in state capitals to formally choose Biden as the next president.

They are Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississipp­i, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and West Virginia.

The Supreme Court, without comment Tuesday, refused to call into question the certificat­ion process in Pennsylvan­ia. Gov. Tom Wolf already has certified Biden’s victory and the

state’s 20 electors are to meet Dec. 14 to cast their votes for the former vice president.

In any case, Biden won 306 electoral votes, so even if Pennsylvan­ia’s results had been in doubt, he still would have more than the 270 electoral votes needed to become president.

Shortly before tweeting about joining Paxton’s case, Trump distanced himself from the Pennsylvan­ia challenge, saying

it wasn’t his.

“The case everyone has been waiting for is the State’s case with Texas and numerous others joining,” he said.

The court’s decision not to intervene in Pennsylvan­ia came in a suit led by Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., and GOP congressio­nal candidate and Trump favorite Sean Parnell, who lost to Democratic Rep. Conor Lamb in the 17th District.

“Even Trump appointees & Republican­s saw this for what it was: a charade,” Lamb said on Twitter.

In court filings, lawyers for Pennsylvan­ia and Wolf, said the suit’s claims were “fundamenta­lly frivolous” and its request “one of the most dramatic, disruptive invocation­s of judicial power in the history of the Republic.”

“No court has ever issued an order nullifying a governor’s certificat­ion of presidenti­al election results,” they wrote.

Having lost the request for the court to intervene immediatel­y, Greg Teufel, a lawyer for Kelly and Parnell, said he would request that the court consider the case on its underlying merits on an expedited basis.

Still, hopes for immediate interventi­on concerning the election “substantia­lly dimmed” with the court’s action Tuesday, Teufel said.

In their underlying suit, Kelly, Parnell and the other Republican plaintiffs sought to either throw out the 2.5 million mail-in ballots submitted under the law or to wipe out the election results and direct the state’s Republican-controlled Legislatur­e to pick Pennsylvan­ia’s presidenti­al electors.

The Republican­s argued that Pennsylvan­ia’s expansive voteby-mail law is unconstitu­tional because it required a constituti­onal amendment to authorize its provisions. Just one Republican state lawmaker voted against its passage last year in the Republican-controlled Legislatur­e.

Biden beat Trump by more than 80,000 votes in Pennsylvan­ia, a state Trump won by about 44,000 votes in 2016. Most mail-in ballots were submitted by Democrats.

 ?? SAULLOEB/GETTY-AFP ?? President Donald Trump distanced himself from a rejected Supreme Court challenge to Pennsylvan­ia’s election results before touting his involvemen­t in a new effort by Texas to overturn the election.
SAULLOEB/GETTY-AFP President Donald Trump distanced himself from a rejected Supreme Court challenge to Pennsylvan­ia’s election results before touting his involvemen­t in a new effort by Texas to overturn the election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States