Censure push for Toomey slows down
GOP fails to hold vote rebuking senator for going against Trump
HARRISBURG, PA. — Pennsylvania Republicans met for more than five hours Wednesday evening to decide on censuring U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey — but came away with nothing resolved.
Around 11:30 p.m., long after the virtual meeting began around 6:30, the meeting broke up without ever getting to a vote on censuring Toomey for being one of just seven GOP senators who voted to convict Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial.
Several people who attended said the meeting, with more than 200 people involved online, was plagued by technical glitches and trouble tabulating an initial vote, though they declined to discuss the specifics of what they voted on.
State party officials said it could take several days to finalize that initial vote, according to people in the meeting, though they would not elaborate on the substance of what was discussed, following instructions from party leaders. It was unclear when the debate would resume.
“I can talk about the outcome, and there was no outcome,” said Joe DiSarro, a state committee member from Allegheny County. “We’re waiting to vote.”
The “censure vote didn’t even come up yet,” said DiSarro, who opposes penalizing the senator.
Toomey spoke to the gathered GOP committee members, and two vocal Trump supporters, U.S. Reps. Mike Kelly and Glenn Thompson, also addressed the group to argue against a censure resolution, according to people in the meeting, which was not open to the public. The party also discussed issuing statements critical of the state’s top Democrats, including Gov. Tom Wolf, Attorney General Josh Shapiro and former Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.
A number of county parties across the state already passed resolutions condemning Toomey’s vote to convict Trump, who remains deeply popular with Republican voters. It appeared momentum was building toward a censure by the larger Republican State Committee.
But others argued that the party should instead unite behind common goals, like winning this year’s campaigns for state Supreme Court, and urged against reprimanding a conservative senator who isn’t seeking reelection.
Toomey’s vote to convict Trump of inciting the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection through months of lies about a stolen election has roiled the party since an impeachment trial that many Republicans saw as unconstitutional and unfair.
Ahead of the meeting, Bill Bretz, chairperson of the Westmoreland County Republicans, said that a potential censure seemed like the most likely topic of discussion, but that it was unclear if there would be enough support to approve it.
“Pennsylvania is a pretty diverse place and I don’t know that people necessarily agree with Sen. Toomey, but they may disagree on whether a censure resolution makes sense,” he said.
Republican state Chairperson Lawrence Tabas and the state party itself did not return numerous messages about Toomey, the impeachment vote, and Wednesday’s meeting.
After an initial burst of censure resolutions, some Republicans
called before the meeting for taking a less drastic approach — or for simply moving on.
“I would prefer making a statement versus a resolution,” said Martha Breene, chairperson of the Venango County GOP. “I’m not at all happy Toomey did it but on the other hand, it’s past and we have very important judgeship races coming.”
Breene said a statement could praise the good Trump did as president and express dissatisfaction with Toomey.
“We don’t see Democrats shooting one another down,” she said.
Any vote would be purely symbolic, especially since Toomey has said he is leaving public office when his term ends after 2022. But it could send a signal as Republicans plot their path forward after Trump’s presidency, and as the party grapples with how much of a role Trump, and loyalty to Trump, will define it in the coming years. The policies and tenor Republicans rally around will shape nationally watched gubernatorial and Senate contests in 2022.
Some of the other Republican senators who voted to convict Trump, including those from North Carolina and Louisiana, also faced backlash.
Toomey has said his vote was to convict a president who “summoned thousands of people to Washington, D.C., inflamed their passions by repeating disproven allegations about widespread fraud, and then urged them to march on the Capitol.”
“A lawless attempt to retain power by a president was one of the founders’ greatest fears,” Toomey said after the impeachment vote.
But polls show a large share of Republican voters believe Trump’s false claims that fraud caused his defeat. Others argue it was unconstitutional to try a former president. (Numerous constitutional scholars, including
prominent conservatives, have said the trial was constitutional.)
The York County Republican Committee passed a resolution that condemned Toomey’s “failure to defend the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees.” The Westmoreland County GOP censured Toomey for supporting “a purely self-serving, vindictive and punitive action by those with establishment political objectives.”
But several Republicans said that while they disagree with Toomey’s vote, they realize it’s viewed differently in different parts of the state. Some said their vote could depend on the exact wording of any resolution or censure.
“If the resolution presented was more of a rebuke of his entire body of work, I don’t know that I would support that,” said Bretz, of Westmoreland County.
Toomey, a senator since 2011, has been leading voice of conservative fiscal policies for decades in Washington, and voted with Trump about 85% of the time. He wrote much of Trump’s signature tax bill and supported nearly all of the former president’s policies, including his conservative judicial appointments. At times, however, Toomey criticized Trump’s personal conduct.
Some Republicans acknowledged a censure was likely to be less palatable in certain parts of the state. In Chester County, for example, where Toomey ran relatively strongly in his 2016 reelection bid and where Trump lost badly, the county GOP twice postponed meetings to discuss a censure resolution, including on Tuesday night.
“We have a very diverse party and a very diverse state and I’ve been around long enough to understand the dynamics of the various counties,” said Jeff Piccola, chairperson of the York County GOP, one of the first to pass a censure.