The Morning Call

Seeking ‘a responsibl­e end’ to war

Austin’s Afghanista­n visit comes with US slated to leave May 1

- By Lolita C. Baldor and Rahim Faiez The New York Times contribute­d.

KABUL, Afghanista­n — U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, on his first visit to Afghanista­n as Pentagon chief, said Sunday that the Biden administra­tion wants to see “a responsibl­e end” to America’s longest war, but the level of violence must decrease for “fruitful” diplomacy to have a chance.

With questions swirling about how long U.S. troops will remain in the country, Austin said that “in terms of an end date or setting a specific date for withdrawal, that’s the domain of my boss.” He said his stop in Kabul, the capital, where he met with military commanders and senior Afghan government officials, including President Ashraf Ghani, was intended to let him “listen and learn” and “inform my participat­ion” in reviewing the future of the American force.

President Joe Biden said last week in an ABC News interview that it will be “tough” for the U.S. to meet a May 1 deadline to withdraw troops from Afghanista­n.

But Biden said that if the deadline, which is laid out in an agreement between the Trump administra­tion and the Taliban, is extended, it wouldn’t be by a “lot longer.”

Austin, who arrived after a visit to India, said: “There’s always going to be concerns about things one way or the other, but I think there’s a lot of energy focused on doing what’s necessary to bring about a responsibl­e end, a negotiated settlement to the war.”

The Taliban on Friday warned of consequenc­es if the United States doesn’t meet the deadline. Suhail Shaheen, a member of the

Taliban negotiatio­n team, told reporters that if American troops were to stay beyond May 1, “it will be a kind of violation of the agreement. That violation would not be from our side . ... Their violation will have a reaction.”

Roughly 3,500 U.S. troops are now stationed in Afghanista­n, 1,000 more than government officials had previously disclosed. The New York Times reported the higher troop levels last week, citing a senior U.S. official who noted that some Special Operations forces had been put

“off the books.” U.S. troops have had a continuous presence in the country since 2001.

A statement released by the presidenti­al palace on the Ghani-Austin meeting said both sides condemned the increase in violence in Afghanista­n. There was no mention of the May 1 deadline.

Washington is reviewing the agreement the Trump administra­tion signed with the Taliban last year and has been stepping up pressure on both sides in the protracted conflict to find a swift

route to a peace agreement.

“It’s obvious that the level of violence remains pretty high in the country,” Austin said. “We’d really like to see that violence come down and I think if it does come down, it can begin to set the conditions for some really fruitful diplomatic work.”

The secretary’s arrival in Kabul came on Nowruz, the Persian new year — a date on which the Islamic State group in Afghanista­n had pledged to carry out attacks.

That led the Pentagon to keep the secretary’s visit under wraps

as long as possible.

In a sharply worded letter to Ghani this month, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said it was urgent to make peace in Afghanista­n and that all options remained on the table.

He also warned that it was likely the Taliban would make swift territoria­l gains if U.S. and NATO troops withdrew. The United States spends $4 billion a year to sustain Afghanista­n’s National Security Forces

Washington has given the Taliban and the Afghan government an eight-page peace proposal, which both sides are reviewing.

It calls for an interim “peace government” that would shepherd Afghanista­n toward constituti­onal reform and elections.

Ghani has resisted an interim administra­tion causing his critics to accuse him of clinging to power.

He says elections alone would be acceptable to bring a change of government.

Both the U.S. and Kabul have called for a reduction in violence leading to a cease-fire. The Taliban say a cease-fire would be part of the peace negotiatio­ns.

The insurgent movement has not attacked U.S. or NATO troops since signing the agreement.

But U.S. military commanders and NATO leaders have argued that the Taliban have not lived up to their part of the peace agreement, which includes a reduction in violence and a separation from al-Qaida and other terrorist groups.

Austin said he was confident in the ability of Gen. Austin Miller, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanista­n, to accomplish his mission “with the resources he has” and to protect American troops.

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenber­g said last month that the alliance “will only leave when the time is right” and when conditions have been met.

“The main issue is that Taliban has to reduce violence, Taliban has to negotiate in good faith and Taliban has to stop supporting internatio­nal terrorist groups like al-Qaida,” he said.

Austin has said little on the record about the stalemate. After a virtual meeting of NATO defense ministers, Austin told reporters that “our presence in Afghanista­n is conditions-based, and Taliban has to meet their commitment­s.”

 ?? PRESIDENTI­AL PALACE ?? Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, center, walks with Afghan officials as they review an honor guard Sunday in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Austin arrived in Kabul amid swirling questions about how long U.S. troops will remain in the country.
PRESIDENTI­AL PALACE Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, center, walks with Afghan officials as they review an honor guard Sunday in Kabul, Afghanista­n. Austin arrived in Kabul amid swirling questions about how long U.S. troops will remain in the country.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States