The Morning Call

COVID-19 home test kits were worth it for one reader

- By Joe Graedon, M.S., and Teresa Graedon, Ph.D. King Features Syndicate In their column, Joe and Teresa Graedon answer letters from readers. Send questions to them via www. peoplespha­rmacy.com.

Q: Thank you for writing about home tests for COVID-19. I developed a headache and sore throat while at work (at a school). Because it took two days to get a PCR test and another three days to get the results, I ended up taking several days off work. Meanwhile, my symptoms quickly abated. When I was later exposed repeatedly to a student who then tested positive, I opted for the home tests. Since I got negative results on both tests 24 hours apart and had no symptoms, I did not need to take time off. That was well worth the $24!

A: There are now several Food and Drug Administra­tion-approved home tests for COVID-19. While not as accurate as the PCR test, they are much faster and more convenient.

The way you used your at-home diagnostic kit, taking two tests a day apart, is recommende­d. This reduces the chance that the initial negative test was inaccurate.

If more people used such a strategy before interactin­g with others who might be vulnerable, it could reduce the spread of COVID-19. This would be especially helpful before gathering for family get-togethers over the upcoming holidays.

Q: I am prone to cold sores/fever blisters and find that acyclovir works very well. Before that I took L-lysine for several years hoping to prevent outbreaks. However, I discovered that L-lysine caused me nightly leg

cramps. My internist, who wasn’t familiar with acyclovir until I told her about it, will not give me a refill without my calling for it. Consequent­ly, I am very careful to call for a refill as soon I am finishing a prescripti­on, because I need to take the pills at that very first tingle. People who haven’t had fever blisters might not understand that urgency.

A: There are several antiviral medication­s that work quite well against herpes simplex, the virus that causes cold sores. Acyclovir (Zovirax) was the first to be developed, but doctors can also prescribe famciclovi­r (Famvir) or valacyclov­ir (Valtrex).

We’re a bit surprised that your internist was unaware of such medication­s. Taking any of these herpes drugs at the earliest hint of an outbreak works best. That is also true of other antiviral drugs such as oseltamivi­r (Tamiflu) or baloxavir (Xofluza) against influenza.

Q: If I feel a cold coming on, I take zinc. I myself don’t have any side effects from

it. However, I recommende­d it for my son once, and it made him very nauseated. Now, of course, he won’t take my advice for any remedy. The nausea side effect of zinc is real, but not everyone suffers from it.

A: Doctors have been debating the pros and cons of zinc to prevent or treat common colds for a long time. However, the scientific evidence keeps building that zinc can help fight these respirator­y tract viral infections.

The most recent research is a meta-analysis of 28 randomized, controlled trials published in BMJ Open (Nov. 2, 2021). In comparison with placebo, zinc prevented five colds per 100 person-months. When people took zinc to treat rather than prevent a cold, they got better about two days sooner, on average. Some people reported nausea as a reaction. As your son can attest, nausea may be more of a problem for some than for others.

 ?? CHRIS DELMAS/GETTY-AFP ?? While not as accurate as the PCR test, home tests are much faster and more convenient.
CHRIS DELMAS/GETTY-AFP While not as accurate as the PCR test, home tests are much faster and more convenient.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States