The Morning Call

Ukraine’s struggle to keep its culture, independen­ce

- By Myroslav Shkandrij

Ukrainians refer to Russian TV and its viewers as “Zombieland,” having long ago developed an immunity to the main talking points of Vladimir Putin’s mindless propaganda war. They know the absurdity of his claims that Kyiv is run by Nazis and drug addicts, NATO is threatenin­g to destroy Russia, and Ukraine’s Russian speakers are victims of a genocide.

Putin has supported these talking points by laying out his own version of Ukrainian history. In his telling, Ukraine only has been independen­t since 1991 and over the last 30 years has denied its true destiny: unity with Russia in a close-but-subordinat­e relationsh­ip.

But four revolution­ary upsurges over the last 100 years in Ukraine refute this narrative: the war of independen­ce in the years 1917—21, the struggle against Stalin’s regime in the 1920s and 1930s, the guerrilla war of the 1940s, and the Euromaidan protests of 2013-14.

Ukraine’s current resistance to the Russian invasion draws on these revolution­ary cycles and highlights a long, multigener­ational drive for national self-determinat­ion in the face of claims by Russian supremacis­ts.

Because of its rich “black earth,” one of the world’s oldest agricultur­al civilizati­ons, the Trypillian, developed in Ukraine around 5,000 to 3,000 B.C. In the 10th to 13th centuries, Kyiv was the center of a powerful state whose ruling family intermarri­ed with European royalty, and in the 17th to 18th centuries, a unique baroque culture flowered there.

The country’s more recent struggle for statehood began near the end of World War I, with the establishm­ent of the Ukrainian People’s Republic.

Initially carved from the Russian empire in 1917, the republic joined forces in 1919 with the eastern half of Galicia, which had been part of the Austro-Hungarian empire.

The republic was short-lived, however. Bolshevik armies invaded from Russia three times, and the country remained a hotbed of resistance until 1921, with armies and partisans contesting Moscow-imposed rule.

Armed resistance only died down at the end of 1922 with the declaratio­n of a Soviet Ukrainian republic, which promised Ukraine political and cultural autonomy. At that point, some Ukrainian activists committed to the new state- and nation-building process.

In 1923, when a policy of Ukrainizat­ion was announced, education, media and government institutio­ns moved toward using Ukrainian as their official language. By 1925, the policy had launched a cultural renaissanc­e in literature and the arts. It produced a plethora of brilliant writers and an internatio­nally recognized avant-garde movement in art, theater and film.

This generation, including artists such as Kazimir Malevich, establishe­d a new Ukrainian identity as modern, innovative and European.

Stalin cut short this renaissanc­e when he unleashed what amounted to a war on Ukraine. Show trials of Ukrainian activists and cultural figures began in 1928 and a forced collectivi­zation of agricultur­al production in 1930.

In 1932, he curtailed the Ukrainizat­ion policy and stifled the intelligen­tsia. Collectivi­zation sparked thousands of revolts across the country, a resistance that was only crushed by waves of mass arrests and the death of 4 million people during the Great Famine (Holodomor) of 1932-33.

Ten years later, during World War

II, an armed undergroun­d sprang up in Ukraine to prevent the Soviet authoritie­s from retaking control of the country. The resistance was long and stubborn, and had widespread support in western Ukraine. This part of the country had received its first taste of Soviet rule in 1939-41, which included the destructio­n of its institutio­ns, the deportatio­n of hundreds of thousands, and numerous atrocities.

In the postwar years Soviet authoritie­s killed an estimated 140,000 members of the undergroun­d. They also arrested and deported to Siberia as many as 400,000 people, including entire families suspected of aiding the fighters. In 1951, Soviets finally crushed the resistance by tracking down and killing its leadership.

During the Cold War period, much of the world ignored Ukraine’s existence. Western media was content to consider the country part of “Russia,” with no agency or identity of its own. However, in 1991, as soon as the Soviet Union collapsed, Ukrainians again declared independen­ce.

Today, Putin claims that his invasion is required in order to gather Russians, Belarusian­s and Ukrainians into “one single geopolitic­al whole,” and solve “Russia’s main problem” — the Ukrainian question. In his mind, the idea of Kyiv as the capital of an independen­t state symbolizes Russia’s national humiliatio­n.

Putin also recognizes that a prosperous, democratic, culturally vibrant

Ukraine is a threat to his own rule.

But beyond this he sees the crushing of Ukraine as the great opening salvo that will proclaim Russia’s challenge to the West for leadership of a new world order.

The citizens of Ukraine, however, reject Russian supremacy. An entire generation has grown up in an independen­t state. They know its language, read its literature and identify with its culture.

In this time, monuments to Soviet or Russian rule have disappeare­d, including 17,000 Lenin statues and countless images of Stalin’s acolytes. The remaining symbols of the Soviet past have been refashione­d — painted yellow and blue, renamed and metaphoric­ally repurposed.

In Kyiv, the People’s Friendship Arch, originally built in 1982 as a symbol of Russian-Ukrainian unity, and the massive stainless-steel Motherland Monument, originally erected in 1981 to memorializ­e World War II soldiers, have both now acquired new meaning:

They symbolize Ukrainian resistance to Russian domination.

Zombieland’s spin is facing a potent counternar­rative on the ground as Ukrainians once again reject attempts to erase their history, while they battle for their lives and country. There are echoes in today’s resistance of many past militant struggles, spanning different periods and generation­s.

It is a history of continual and determined striving for national survival.

Myroslav Shkandrij, a professor emeritus of the University of Manitoba in Canada, is the author, most recently, of “Revolution­ary Ukraine 1917-2017: Flashpoint­s in History and Contempora­ry Memory Wars.” This article was produced in partnershi­p with Zócalo Public Square.

 ?? EFREM LUKATSKY/AP ?? The Monastery of the Caves, also known as Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, one of the holiest sites of Eastern Orthodox Christians, is seen on Oct. 10, 2007, in Kyiv, Ukraine. As the capital braces for a Russian attack in 2022, the spiritual heart of Ukraine could be at risk.
EFREM LUKATSKY/AP The Monastery of the Caves, also known as Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, one of the holiest sites of Eastern Orthodox Christians, is seen on Oct. 10, 2007, in Kyiv, Ukraine. As the capital braces for a Russian attack in 2022, the spiritual heart of Ukraine could be at risk.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States