The Morning Call

Farmers’ dislike of Brexit growing

Recruiting group: Rules led big ‘drop in immigrant workers’

- By Stephen Castle

BOSTON, England — For four decades, the prime agricultur­al land that Sarah Pettitt’s family rented near its home produced bumper crops of vegetables, including purple sprouting broccoli destined for the shelves of upscale British supermarke­ts.

But when post-Brexit migration rules kicked in, curbing recruitmen­t from Eastern Europe, a vital stream of workers dried up in this area close to Britain’s eastern coastline.

Pettitt said she had little choice but to cut production by one-fifth.

“If you can’t get people to come and harvest it, you’re not going to take your pound notes out of your back pocket and chuck them in the fire,” she said as gray clouds hung over the 100-acre expanse of flat, fertile land that her family routinely rented from a local farmer but has now given up.

Two years after Britain left the European Union’s economic area, ending the ability of the bloc’s citizens to automatica­lly work in Britain, the effects of Brexit are unfolding across the economy.

One of the clearest is a shortfall of 330,000 workers, mostly in less-skilled jobs, including transporta­tion, retail and hospitalit­y, according to the Center for European Reform and U.K. in a Changing Europe, two research institutes.

That dearth of workers has hit the food and farming sectors particular­ly hard. Last year, about $27 million worth of fruit and vegetables went unharveste­d, according to a survey by the National Farmers’ Union.

In the survey, 40% of respondent­s said they had

suffered crop losses, and more than half said they had cut back production.

Pettitt, for one, would welcome more Poles, Latvians or Lithuanian­s to Boston — “that would be fantastic,” she said.

But in the years since Britain voted to quit the European Union, many have left the country, and Brexit is making it hard to recruit replacemen­ts. And harvesting crops, she said, is a job many Britons have long avoided.

Brexit has meant “a massive drop in immigrant workers,” according to an assessment by an agricultur­al recruiting group.

At the time of the vote in 2016, Brexit supporters were chafing at what they felt was a loss of sovereignt­y to the European Union, notably on control of immigratio­n.

Opinion polls now show that Britons’ sentiments have begun to shift against Brexit, as business owners cite difficulty in finding workers, as well as thorny trade issues and what they describe as onerous paperwork requiremen­ts.

In Boston, where residents strongly supported Brexit, there is little evidence that attitudes have changed toward the European Union. But people like Pettitt are coming to realize the effects of Brexit on their own lives and livelihood­s.

Located 160 miles north of London, Boston has became a prime example of Britain’s 21st-century population shifts.

When a group of former Communist countries joined the European Union in 2004, Britain was one of only three of the bloc’s

nations that immediatel­y opened their labor markets to the new workforce. At the time, Poland’s economy was suffering from high unemployme­nt, and hundreds of thousands of Poles moved to Britain, including highly motivated young people with good qualificat­ions.

With many jobs to be had, particular­ly in farming and food processing, Boston swelled in size after 2004.

But the influx of immigrants put pressure on schools and medical services, stoking a local backlash that eventually contribute­d to a pro-Brexit sentiment in the town a decade later.

But with the onset of Brexit, the situation was basically reversed — now workers from countries like Poland could not come to Britain to work without a visa. At the same time, the economies of countries in Eastern Europe improved, making jobs there more attractive and luring some — even those who had the right to stay in Britain — back home.

“It doesn’t seem to be as advantageo­us for some East European employees to come over and try and make a living because it’s more competitiv­e to be back in their own country,” said Simon Beardsley, the CEO for Lincolnshi­re Chamber of Commerce, a business group, referring to agricultur­e, food processing and hospitalit­y.

When the coronaviru­s pandemic hit in 2020, even more drifted home, and some of those who stayed anyway moved away from farm work.

Replacing them is tough.

Employment agencies in Britain still recruit many workers from abroad. But Pettitt, who once employed as many as 22 people, said that even with immigratio­n from faraway places, including the Middle East and Asia, there are not enough workers for her to sustain her previous production, especially at peak times.

She was finding it difficult, she said, to find people — including Britons — who were willing to work on farms, or who were as motivated and reliable as those from Eastern Europe.

“They come with all the best intentions on the Monday, moan and groan about the fact that they had to arrive at 7,” she said. “They’d stay, but you’d not see them the next day. It’s all too hard or too difficult or too uncomforta­ble.”

 ?? ANDREW TESTA/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Eastern European farmworker­s harvest cabbage for Naylor Farms on Jan. 5 near Boston, England.
ANDREW TESTA/THE NEW YORK TIMES Eastern European farmworker­s harvest cabbage for Naylor Farms on Jan. 5 near Boston, England.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States