The Morning Call

Twitter data part of Jan. 6 inquiry

Special counsel used warrant for records to Trump’s account

- By Alanna Durkin Richer Associated Press

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team obtained a search warrant in January for records related to former President Donald Trump’s Twitter account, and a judge levied a $350,000 fine on the company for missing the deadline to comply, according to court documents released Wednesday.

The new details were included in a ruling from the federal appeals court in Washington over a legal battle surroundin­g the warrant that has played out under seal for months. The court rejected Twitter’s claim that it should not have been held in contempt or sanctioned.

Smith’s team repeatedly mentioned Trump’s tweets in an indictment unsealed last week that charges the former president with conspiring to subvert the will of voters and cling to power after he lost the 2020 election to Democrat Joe Biden.

Trump, a Republican, has pleaded not guilty to charges including conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstructio­n of Congress’ certificat­ion of Biden’s win. He posted on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday that the Justice Department “secretly attacked” his Twitter account, and he characteri­zed the investigat­ion as an attempt to “infringe” on his bid to reclaim the White House in 2024.

It’s unclear what informatio­n Smith may have sought from Trump’s account. Possibilit­ies include data about when and where the posts were written, their engagement and the identities of other accounts that reposted Trump’s content.

The search warrant underscore­s the breadth of the investigat­ion and the lengths Smith has gone to to obtain evidence to build his case. In a recent signal that Smith’s investigat­ion is continu

ing, former New York Police Commission­er Bernie Kerik met Monday with investigat­ors from special counsel Smith’s team.

Prosecutor­s obtained the search warrant on Jan. 17 directing Twitter to produce informatio­n on Trump’s account after a court “found probable cause to search the account for evidence of criminal offenses,” according to the ruling. The government also obtained a nondisclos­ure agreement that had prohibited Twitter from disclosing the search warrant, the filing says.

The court found that disclosing the warrant could risk that Trump could jeopardize the ongoing investigat­ion by giving him “an opportunit­y to destroy evidence, change patterns of behavior” or notify his allies, the filing says.

Twitter objected to the nondisclos­ure agreement, saying four days after the compliance deadline that it would not produce any of the account informatio­n, according to the ruling. The judges wrote that Twitter “did not question the validity of the search warrant” but argued that the nondisclos­ure agreement violated its First Amendment right to communicat­e with Trump.

Twitter said if it had to turn over the records before the judge assessed the legality of the nondisclos­ure agreement, it would prevent Trump “from asserting executive privilege to shield communicat­ions made using his Twitter account,” the document says.

The warrant ordered Twitter to provide the records by Jan. 27. A judge found Twitter to be in contempt after a court hearing on Feb. 7, but gave the company an opportunit­y to hand over the documents by 5 p.m. that evening. Twitter, however, only turned over some records that day. It didn’t fully comply with the order until Feb. 9, the ruling says.

X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, sent an automated reply to a recent request for comment, saying it would respond soon.

In the broader case against Trump, his legal team has indicated it will argue that he was relying on the advice of lawyers in 2020 and had the right to challenge an election he believed was rigged.

Trump used his Twitter account in the weeks leading up to his supporters’ attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to spread false statements about the election that prosecutor­s allege were designed to sow mistrust in the democratic process. The indictment details how Trump over Twitter encouraged his followers to come to Washington on Jan. 6, pressured his Vice President Mike Pence to reject the certificat­ion and falsely suggested that the mob at the Capitol — which beat police officers and smashed windows — was peaceful.

The warrant arrived at Twitter amid rapid changes instituted by owner Elon Musk, who purchased the platform last year.

The election conspiracy case is the second case Smith has brought against Trump. The former president is also facing dozens of felony counts stemming from classified documents found at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.

Trump’s legal team in court papers Wednesday urged the judge to allow for the reestablis­hment of a secure facility at Trump’s home where the former president can discuss classified evidence with his attorneys while they prepare for trial in that case.

Prosecutor­s say Trump should only be able to do so at sensitive compartmen­ted informatio­n facilities — or SCIFs. But Trump’s lawyers say “immense practical and logistical hurdles and costs” would make traveling to government-approved locations difficult. He wants to recreate the same secure facility at Mar-a-Lago in which he was allowed to discuss classified materials as president.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States