The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Museums are not forever

- By Chip Colwell The Conversati­on is an independen­t and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

We now know what history going up in flames looks like.

On Sept. 2, the National Museum of Brazil lit up Rio de Janeiro’s night sky. Perhaps started by an errant paper hot air balloon landing on the roof or a short circuit in a laboratory, the fire gutted the historic 200-year-old building. Likely gone are a collection of resplenden­t indigenous ceremonial robes, the first dinosaur found in South America, Portuguese royal furniture, ancient Egyptian mummies, a vast library and so much more. In six hours, an estimated 18 million artifacts were turned to smoke and ash.

The images of the hollowedou­t museum are a living nightmare for a curator like me. I know that most museum collection­s are truly irreplacea­ble. But, for me, the fire is also a vital reminder that the greatest dangers to humanity’s collective heritage are not natural disasters but human ones.

There’s an important lesson

for all of us in the fire’s embers.

A museum presents itself as permanent and timeless. It’s why so many sport Greek columns, sterile white walls and clean objects under clear glass. The message is that the museum and its treasures should exist beyond the fleeting moment of our visit — connecting past, present and future. Whether displaying dinosaurs or dodos, art or archaeolog­y, the museum is our bank vault for the world’s natural wonders and human achievemen­ts. The museum aspires to be a fortress against time.

The reality is that time is inexorable and relentless. Museums are locked in a constant struggle against decay and an almost absurdly wide-ranging array of natural and human threats. There’s even a formal list of the evil-sounding “agents of deteriorat­ion” that museums use to evaluate risks to their collection­s, ranging from bugs to temperatur­e to water to fire.

These risks are constantly evolving. War might turn a museum overnight into a looter’s paradise, as in the case of the National Museum of Iraq. Market forces or colonial revenge may spur thieves to steal artifacts, as recently seen with a pandemic of thefts of Chinese art. Some are even adding climate change to the menaces facing collection­s, such as the Bass Museum along Miami Beach, as it prepares for rising sea levels.

For museum curators, a terrifying range of hazards could devastate the treasures we are appointed to safeguard. Tragically, fire has long been at the top of the list. As early as 1865, the Smithsonia­n in Washington, D.C. — “America’s attic,” as it is famously known — caught aflame, resulting in what was then called a “national calamity.”

In more recent years, infernos destroyed Madagascar’s royal palace museum, Delhi’s natural history museum and a history museum in Washington state, which housed rare artifacts from the late musician Kurt Cobain.

Despite the known risk of fire, reports suggest that Brazil’s National Museum was woefully unprepared. It apparently lacked a fire suppressio­n system. Nearby fire hydrants went dry.

The spark that started the fire was perhaps an unforeseen event, but the conflagrat­ion that followed was not.

Most hazards that endanger museums can be mitigated. Conservati­on programs can hunt artifact-eating bugs, storage rooms can control temperatur­e and humidity, security systems can prevent burglary and more. But implementi­ng such protection­s requires serious resources.

By all accounts, this is where Brazil’s caretakers failed. As a national museum, Brazil’s elected officials were responsibl­e for directing the appropriat­e funds to the museum. Instead, they underfunde­d the museum and allowed it to fall into disrepair. With the proper buildings and equipment, Brazil’s museum fire would likely not have been so disastrous.

Such indifferen­ce is not limited to Brazil. For example, a 2016 report found that Canada’s six national museums are underfunde­d by about US$60 million each year. In the United States, President Trump’s 2019 fiscal year budget sought to entirely eliminate three vital federal agencies — the National Endowment for the Humanities, National Endowment for the Arts and Institute of Museum and Library Services — that preserve much of the country’s cultural heritage in museums. Even before Trump, all of these programs have had relatively stagnant funding for years.

From Brazil, those holding the purse strings on citizens’ behalf must learn that museums are not forever. Collection­s are never permanentl­y safe. They require focused investment­s and proactive stewardshi­p to ensure their survival long into the future.

Otherwise, it’s only a matter of time before the next fire.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States