The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Balancing bone health, breast cancer risk

- To Your Good Health — B.I. — A.B. Contact Dr. Roach at ToYourGood­Health@med. cornell.edu.

DEAR DR. ROACH » I just read your column about Fosamax and wondered what you thought about Evista (raloxifene). I have been on it for 13 or 14 years because both my sisters have had breast cancer and

I have osteopenia.

Is this something that can be taken indefinite­ly, or do I need to stop? My gynecologi­st says to keep taking it, but I wonder what you think.

ANSWER » One major concern about long-term use of alendronat­e (Fosamax) and other drugs of that class (called bisphospho­nates) is that they shut down reabsorpti­on of the bone so completely that people are at risk for complicati­ons such as osteonecro­sis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures. These complicati­ons are uncommon, and the benefit of taking the medication outweighs the risk in most women with osteoporos­is; however, prolonged use may start to cause more harm than benefit, especially in women with mild or moderate osteoporos­is.

Raloxifene, by contrast, works on the bone as an estrogen, while working on the breast as an antiestrog­en. In women with both low bone mass and increased risk for breast cancer, it is a good choice. Raloxifene is not as potent an agent as Fosamax, and that’s probably a good thing for you: With osteopenia, you do not need as potent an agent, and the risk of osteonecro­sis of the jaw and of atypical femur fractures appears lower with raloxifene. Raloxifene does have its own risks. Blood clots occurred in about one woman per thousand in the six years of the study. Less than one woman per thousand had a stroke in the raloxifene group per year.

DEAR DR. ROACH » I am a dedicated reader of your column and appreciate very much your attention to detail. I was surprised to read in my local paper recently that you recommend hand sanitizer over hand-washing with soap and water. This is contrary to all other health advice I have seen. Please explain. I do understand using it when one cannot use soap and water.

ANSWER »

I don’t think I explained that very well, as several people have written to me with the same question. Hand-washing with soap and water is preferred for many or most situations. However, in the hospital, when health care workers need to perform hand hygiene many times daily, alcohol-based hand sanitizer may be preferred.

There are some situations where hand sanitizer should not be used and hands should be washed with soap and water: when hands are visibly soiled; when they start feeling “sticky”; and in the cases of some infections, especially C. difficile and norovirus. In all cases, hands should be washed after using the bathroom, and before and after eating.

 ??  ?? Keith Roach
Keith Roach

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States