The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Should foreign language be required?

Language study desirable, not essential

- Jenna A. Robinson is president of the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal in Raleigh, N.C. She wrote this for InsideSour­ces.com.

University students of yesteryear read the classics. Aristotle, Euclid, Homer and Plato were part of the regular course of study. And students read these challengin­g texts in their original languages —

Greek or Latin. The

Latin they learned in order to read the classics had many second-order benefits. Half of our English vocabulary comes from Latin words and roots. Science, technology, medicine, theology, philosophy and law use Latin extensivel­y.

To its detriment, the modern university has mostly abandoned this model. Only a few classic works are still required as part of the general education curriculum at most universiti­es. And these days there are plenty of excellent English translatio­ns to choose from. Nobody bothers with Latin anymore, let alone Greek.

Instead, there is a generic foreign language requiremen­t: a sad vestige of this old system. Students typically must take (or test out of) three semesters of any foreign language they choose. And no one cares whether it is wholly disconnect­ed from the rest of the general education curriculum or a student’s chosen major. Why bother?

Convention­al wisdom claims there are great benefits to learning a foreign language. It can help with memory as well as a student’s understand­ing of English grammar and vocabulary. It can enhance students’ ability to multitask. And it can improve student performanc­e in other subjects.

But it isn’t clear whether these benefits are truly lasting. A recent metaanalys­is of bilingual education, appearing in Psychologi­cal Bulletin, concluded that “available evidence does not provide systematic support for the widely held notion that bilinguali­sm is associated with benefits in cognitive control functions in adults.”

But even if there are great benefits of bilinguali­sm or from the lifetime study of Latin that was once common, they have little to do with current campus practice.

Today’s three-semester requiremen­t is not a serious effort to encourage bilinguali­sm. The first three courses in any foreign language are necessaril­y very elementary. In them, students will work on basic vocabulary, regular verbs and simple sentences. Almost everything will be in the present tense. And that’s only if students are studying a language that uses the Latin alphabet. Three semesters of Mandarin Chinese, or any other language with a foreign alphabet, is barely scratching the surface.

And in a world of Google Translate and Duolingo, the practical advantages of learning a little bit of conversati­onal French or Spanish in college aren’t what they used to be. Anyone who wants to learn basic travel expression­s and phrases to help them navigate a continenta­l vacation can easily do so in a few weeks on the internet.

Given this low return on foreign language courses, it makes more sense to devote the three semesters now taken up by foreign language to other subjects.

The list of candidates is long. Many students enter college woefully ignorant. They have not read the Great Books. They don’t recognize or understand the American system of government. They are unfamiliar with the scientific method. They don’t have the habits of mind that engender lifelong learning. And employers report that recent college graduates are often deficient in oral and written communicat­ions skills — in English!

Any courses that contribute­d to a common, basic level of cultural literacy would be more valuable than third-semester German. And courses that add to job skills — such as statistics, logic or public speaking — would help students far more than most foreign languages.

The goal of general education requiremen­ts should be to create a broad foundation of knowledge and understand­ing that acquaints students with “the best that has been written and said” and prepares them for further study. While desirable, the skills conferred in foreign language courses aren’t essential for understand­ing what makes us all human, for liberating the mind, or for making meaning of the world. Nor are they good preparatio­n, in most cases, for students’ majors.

Universiti­es must prioritize which courses students should take — and foreign language doesn’t make the cut.

 ?? ?? Jenna A. Robinson
Jenna A. Robinson
 ?? METRO CREATIVE CONNECTION ??
METRO CREATIVE CONNECTION

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States