The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Shutting out natural gas can destabiliz­e grid

- Llewellyn King is executive producer and host of “White House Chronicle” on PBS. His email is llewellynk­ing1@ gmail.com. He wrote this for InsideSour­ces.com.

It has been an annus horribilis for the nation’s electric utility companies.

Deadly storms and wildfires have left hundreds of thousands — and for short periods millions — of electricit­y customers without power, sometimes for days and weeks.

These destructiv­e weather events have come at a time when utilities are being squeezed from all directions: By customer needs, by activists’ demands, by state regulators, and by the zero-carbon urgency of the Biden administra­tion as expressed in its bill, the Build Back Better Act, to upgrade and overhaul the nation’s infrastruc­ture.

The utilities themselves have set ambitious carbonemis­sion-reduction goals, but in some cases, they still can’t meet the demands of the government.

They are caught between the clear need to harden their infrastruc­ture against severe weather and shuttering their reliable but polluting coal plants and mothballin­g their dependable gas turbines.

This predicamen­t caused Jim Matheson, president of the National Rural Electric Cooperativ­e Associatio­n, which represents hundreds of utilities, mostly small, in rural areas, to ask Congress to make exceptions, or at least to understand that things can’t be changed overnight.

In a letter to House Committee on Energy and Commerce Chairman Frank Palone (D-N.J.) and ranking minority member Cathy McMorris Rogers (Wash.), Matheson said there was concern with the Clean Electricit­y Performanc­e Program part of the bill.

“The CEPP’s very narrow, 10-year program implementa­tion window is unrealisti­c. The electric co-ops have existing contractua­l obligation­s and resource developmen­t plans that extend for several years, if not decades. Many of those plans continued deployment of a diverse set of affordable, clean electricit­y sources, but not all those plans align with the CEPP. …. The narrow implementa­tion window also limits our ability to take advantage of technologi­es like energy storage, carbon capture, or advanced nuclear, which are unlikely to be deployable in the near term,” Matheson said.

The predicamen­t of utilities is that there is no reliable storage and that the two principal sources of renewable power, wind and solar, are subject to the vagaries of weather.

During Winter Storm Uri, which hit Texas last February, solar, along with all other sources of energy, froze under sheets of snow and ice.

The result was disaster and heavy loss of life.

In that instance, gas didn’t save the day: Lines and instrument­s froze, and what gas was available was sold at astronomic­al prices.

The lesson was clear: Prepare for the worst.

That lesson was repeated in a series of hurricanes, including devastatin­g Ida which plunged parts of Louisiana into the dark for more than a week.

If the lesson hasn’t been grasped in the United States, it is being repeated in Europe right now.

A unique wind drought that lasted six weeks has left the European grid reeling and has thrown Britain into a full energy crisis.

The issue is not that alternativ­e energy — wind and solar for now — isn’t the way to go to reduce the amount of carbon spewing into the atmosphere.

Instead, it is not to destabiliz­e what you have by prematurel­y taking gas offline.

Gas has certain useful qualities not the least of which is that it can be stored.

Storage is the bugaboo of alternativ­e energy.

Batteries are good for a few hours at best and the other main way of storing energy, pumped storage, requires large expenditur­es, substantia­l engineerin­g, and a usable site.

It requires the creation of a big water impoundmen­t, which will provide hydro when extra power is needed. It works, it is efficient, and it isn’t something that you build in a jiffy.

I have spent half a century writing about the electricit­y industry and when it comes to decarboniz­ation, I can say that while many in the industry were doubtful about global warming at one time, the industry now is committed to eliminatin­g carbon emissions by 2050.

The joker is storage or some other way of backing up the alternativ­es.

That may be hydrogen, but a lot of research and engineerin­g must take place before it flows through the pipes which now carry natural gas. Likewise, for small modular reactors.

The Economist, pointing to Europe, says that the Europeans have destabiliz­ed their grid by failing to prepare for the transition to alternativ­es, triggering a global natural gas shortage.

Gas should be used sparingly and treasured.

The trick is to throw out the bathwater and save the baby.

 ?? ?? Llewellyn King
Llewellyn King

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States