The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

Can Michigan use Alabama’s success as blueprint vs. Georgia?

- By Ralph D. Russo

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA.

Georgia’s defense was nearly invincible for three months, allowing less than a touchdown per game.

Then came the Southeaste­rn Conference championsh­ip game against Alabama, where the Crimson Tide seemingly cracked the code on the Bulldogs’ stingy D in a 41-24 victory.

As No. 2 Michigan prepares to face No. 3 Georgia in the College Football Playoff semifinal at the Orange Bowl on Jan. 31, how much of Alabama’s plan can be replicated by the Wolverines?

“It’s hard to say blueprint because if it only happens one game in a year it obviously didn’t work too well for too many other people,” Michigan offensive coordinato­r Josh Gattis said Dec. 27. “But you know, it does give you a little bit of confidence.” Good teams have bad games, but Georgia’s defensive meltdown against Alabama was a special kind of outlier.

Since 2000, only four teams have held their opponents below 10 points per game for an entire season: Alabama in 2011 (8.15); USC in 2008 (9.0); Miami in 2001 (9.36); and TCU in 2000 (9.64).

Georgia has a chance to become the fifth, entering the playoff having allowed 9.5 points per game.

None of those previous four teams allowed more than 27 points in a regularsea­son game. The 41 points Georgia allowed to the Crimson Tide represents a third of the Bulldogs’ season total of 124.

Going back to 2009, no defense that has led the nation in yards per play —- which Georgia currently does at 4.01 —has had a worse single game than the 7.66 ypp the Bulldogs allowed to Alabama.

Only Texas in 2009 (7.29 against Texas A&M) and Alabama in 2011 (7.41 to Georgia Southern) have led the country in yards per play allowed and had a game in which they permitted more than 7.0 yards per play.

Georgia defensive coordinato­r Dan Lanning, who is working two jobs these days as he prepares to take over as Oregon head coach, said one poor performanc­e didn’t send the Bulldogs scrambling back to the drawing board.

“I think you have to approach it like any game that we have had this season where you go back and you try to be analytical, regardless of the result,” Lanning said. “We take a deep dive every single game when we’re successful, we take a deep dive when we’re not.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States