The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

‘Remain in Mexico’ policy should remain

Less than a year after canceling former President Donald Trump’s “remain in Mexico” policy toward migrants attempting to enter the U.S., the Biden administra­tion has started enforcing it again — all too reluctantl­y.

-

Restoring the policy is a necessary step toward gaining control over the crisis at the country’s southern border.

Under Trump’s policy, officially called the Migrant Protection Protocols, migrants who were apprehende­d at the border were required to stay in Mexico while they waited for their cases to be heard. Between 2019 and 2021, about 70,000 people were returned to the Mexican side of the border. Those whose cases made it to the front of the queue were allowed to enter the U.S. for court hearings, but had to return to Mexico until a final determinat­ion was made about their status.

There’s evidence that this policy yielded results. Apprehensi­ons on the southweste­rn border fell 30% in its first year. The U.S. also appears to have expedited the processing of claims for those in the program. Because of a backlog of 1.3 million immigratio­n cases, migrants in the U.S. can go years before their first court date. By comparison, more than half of all MPP cases were completed by February 2021.

Even so, the program wasn’t without flaws. Critics faulted the administra­tion for failing to provide adequate transporta­tion for migrants to make court hearings; as a result, thousands lost their asylum cases in absentia and were deported. Those waiting in Mexico endured harsh living conditions with little protection from the weather, gangs and human trafficker­s.

President Joe Biden instructed federal immigratio­n agencies to stop enrolling migrants into MPP and allow those in Mexico to wait in the U.S. while their cases were processed. In August, a federal judge found that the administra­tion had improperly rescinded the policy and ordered it reinstated, a ruling upheld by the Supreme Court. In the meantime, U.S. Customs and Border Protection has reported the highest-ever number of migrant encounters this year. After Biden’s meeting with Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador in November, the administra­tion announced plans to restart MPP. The White House insists, however, that it is not doing so “eagerly.” Last week, the administra­tion asked the Supreme Court to revisit its earlier ruling and allow the administra­tion to rescind the policy.

That would be misguided. Rather than send mixed messages about its commitment to MPP, the administra­tion should focus on making it more effective. It should expand coordinati­on with the Mexican government to provide temporary housing and bolster security for those sent back across the border. Limiting the distance asylum seekers have to travel for court appearance­s would bolster their chances of receiving a fair hearing.

The administra­tion should also increase the number of immigratio­n judges assigned to the border and provide courts with the resources necessary to meet the government’s goal of resolving MPP claims within 180 days.

Biden’s rush to undo any immigratio­n policies associated with his predecesso­r has contribute­d to upheaval at the border and encouraged more people to risk their lives trying to reach the U.S. In the process, it has undermined public support for the comprehens­ive immigratio­n reforms the country needs.

— Bloomberg

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States