The Morning Journal (Lorain, OH)

‘Emergency’ is ending. Here’s who will be hurt

- By Wendy Netter Epstein and Daniel Goldberg

In the State of the Union, President Joe Biden stated that “we have broken COVID’s grip on us.” Indeed, COVID-19 deaths are down about 75% since last year’s speech. Consistent with that progress, the Biden administra­tion announced in January that it will end the public health emergency (and national emergency) declaratio­ns on May 11.

Yet nearly 500 Americans are dying from COVID-19 per day. As many as 1 in 5 U.S. adults who contract the virus experience some effects of long COVID. And the toll of the disease has never been distribute­d equally.

Historians have long pointed out that pandemics tend to reveal social inequaliti­es and often make them worse, as we have seen with COVID. Studies show that people in areas of social disadvanta­ge have died from COVID at higher rates than those in affluent areas. After controllin­g for difference­s in age, people of color have contracted COVID at higher rates, and have died at higher rates, than white people.

It was these inequities that prompted the Biden administra­tion, Congress and some states to adopt policies designed to even the playing field. These policies meant that most Americans could access COVID testing, treatment and vaccines for free or close to free. They also addressed access issues — getting people insured — by expanding Affordable Care Act subsidies for exchange policies, offering a temporary Medicaid coverage option for uninsured people in 15 states, and by not disenrolli­ng anyone from Medicaid in all states during the public health emergency.

But with the end of the public health emergency, so too comes the end of many of these protection­s. Most uninsured people will no longer be able to access free COVID tests. Medicaid continuous coverage is ending. The federal uninsured fund has already lapsed.

A direct consequenc­e will be that the uninsured and undocument­ed people, almost half of whom are uninsured, won’t be able to access care for COVID. This is a tragedy in its own right and is likely to expand racial health inequaliti­es connected to COVID.

Perhaps the most consequent­ial change ahead is the looming loss of Medicaid eligibilit­y for millions of low-income Americans. As part of a spending bill signed into law in December, states will soon begin a redetermin­ation process for deciding Medicaid eligibilit­y. Disenrollm­ents can begin as soon as April. As many as 18 million enrollees may lose coverage. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services predicts that people of color are much more likely to lose coverage based on administra­tive hurdles alone, even if they remain eligible for Medicaid.

This massive coverage loss in a short period of time could have devastatin­g consequenc­es, further straining already-stretched hospitals, diminishin­g access to necessary screenings and care for chronic disease, as well as increasing emergency department use and medical debt for low-income Americans. Black and Hispanic people are twice as likely as white people to be enrolled in Medicaid and more likely to be directly impacted.

There are actions states should take now to prevent worsening COVID inequities. State government­s can start by encouragin­g those who lose Medicaid coverage to get alternativ­e coverage that will provide COVID benefits. Many will be eligible for free or reduced cost plans in the Affordable Care Act marketplac­e.

States could also look at other ways to ensure access to social safety net programs for low-income communitie­s. For instance, in November, Colorado opened enrollment for a program called OmniSalud that assists undocument­ed residents and individual­s with protection­s through the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program to obtain affordable healthcare insurance through the state’s marketplac­e. By January, 10,000 Colorado residents had enrolled.

In many states, however, undocument­ed immigrants and some people who cannot afford a policy have limited options to obtain coverage, particular­ly in the 11 states that have not expanded Medicaid. As such, states and localities must also continue to look for ways to provide free COVID testing and treatment to uninsured population­s.

Finally, good public health requires more than access to healthcare. States can work to enact social policies that are likely to reduce COVID-related inequaliti­es, such as paid sick leave laws, universal basic income requiremen­ts and supplement­al nutrition assistance programs.

The Biden administra­tion’s decision to end the public health emergency is in some sense understand­able. States of emergency cannot persist indefinite­ly. Even the World Health Organizati­on recently signaled that it may be preparing to end its declaratio­n of the COVID pandemic as a “public health emergency of internatio­nal concern.” But moving out of the declared emergency doesn’t mean we should forget that the burden of COVID is borne disproport­ionately by vulnerable communitie­s. Policies to prevent worsening COVID-driven inequities can — and should — be enacted now.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States