The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Armageddon postponed

- Cal Thomas Contact Cal Thomas at tcaeditors@tribpub.com.

North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un appears to have blinked and President Trump can claim a foreign policy victory and justificat­ion for his strategy.

Reminiscen­t of President Ronald Reagan’s “peace through strength” approach to deterring adversarie­s, President Trump stood up to the blustering despot and forced him to back down from his threat to launch missiles at Guam.

China, North Korea’s biggest ally, no doubt played a role in getting Kim to change his mind, but primary credit should go to the president.

What a far cry from the policies of the last several administra­tions. They favored diplomacy over confrontat­ion, allowing North Korea to proceed with its clandestin­e nuclear program in exchange for empty promises.

Former President Jimmy Carter, former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson and Secretary of State Madeleine Albright were among those who visited North Korea on various diplomatic missions. Albright engaged in a champagne

President Trump deserves credit for standing up for the country and confrontin­g one of the world’s most unpredicta­ble dictators.

toast with Kim’s father, Kim Jong-il, after claiming success in getting the country to curtail its missile program. We have seen the failure of that approach and are witnessing the success of its opposite.

Though Kim seems to have backed down from launching missiles at Guam and touting his capability to strike targets on the U.S. mainland, He has retained his overheated rhetoric. In a case of the pot calling the kettle black, Kim warned the U.S., as reported by The Wall Street Journal, “to take into full account” whether the current standoff was to its benefit. He added it was incumbent on the U.S. to “stop at once arrogant provocatio­ns against the DPRK (North Korea) and unilateral demands and not provoke it any longer.” Who provoked whom? Kim added, “If the Yankees persist in their extremely dangerous reckless actions on the Korean Peninsula and in its vicinity, testing the self-restraint of the DPRK, the [North] will make an important decision as it already declared,” meaning he might still order a strike against Guam, or put some missiles offshore to test American resolve.

American resolve has been tested and has prevailed, at least for now. Kim has lost face. His military leaders and others will take notice, as will the rest of the world.

The significan­ce of the unanimous UN resolution imposing new sanctions on North Korea, which included the support of China, could not have been lost on Kim.

New presidents almost always face a foreign policy test. Some pass, some fail. John F. Kennedy was judged weak by Soviet dictator Nikita Khrushchev, which many believe precipitat­ed the Cuban missile crisis in 1962. Iran believed press reports that Ronald Reagan was a “cowboy” and dangerous, so they released American hostages on the day of his inaugurati­on in 1981.

There is a time for diplomacy and a time for displaying strength. President Obama sent a signal to the world by setting a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanista­n before victory over the Taliban could be achieved. He apologized to the world for what he saw as America’s “arrogance.” Our enemies took notice and viewed his statements as an invitation to adventuris­m.

President Trump and his defense secretary, Gen. James “Mad Dog” Mattis, took another approach, returning Kim’s rhetorical fire with rhetorical fire of their own. It worked, at least temporaril­y. Where to go from here remains an open question, but the goal remains the same. North Korea (and Iran) must never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons capable of reaching the United States or threatenin­g America’s allies, including South Korea and Japan.

President Trump deserves credit for standing up for the country and confrontin­g one of the world’s most unpredicta­ble dictators.

He probably won’t get any credit from the media, most Democrats, or the foreign policy establishm­ent, but our adversarie­s are bound to take notice and perhaps adjust their view of the president in ways that benefit America.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States