The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

How long does Fosamax stay in system?

- Keith Roach Contact Dr. Roach at ToYourGood­Health@med. cornell.edu.

DEAR DR. ROACH » I have read in your previous columns that you have been cautionary about taking medication­s like Fosamax. I hope you can help me with my situation. I am 76 years old. I took Fosamax for 13 years, stopping in 2010. My last scan showed a Tscore of -2.4 in the spine and -2.1 in the hip, which was a little worse than last time.

Does Fosamax stay in the system and continue to work? If so, for how long? You previously have recommende­d re-evaluation after five years; does that mean not to go on it again in the future? What are some alternativ­es? — E.M. DEAR READER » Thirteen years is a long time to continue taking a bisphospho­nate drug, such as alendronat­e (Fosamax) or risedronat­e (Actonel). There are not good studies to show effectiven­ess beyond 10 years. There does seem to be some residual effect on bone density after stopping: Bone density remained higher and fracture risk lower, correspond­ing with data showing that the medication remains in the bone for years (and possibly decades) after stopping it.

If your bone density is getting worse, it is reasonable to consider restarting treatment. I don’t have enough informatio­n to make a recommenda­tion to you; other items that should be considered include your risk for fracture (the FRAX score is commonly used), the rate of decline (if any) of the bone density and evaluation of other risk factors, especially vitamin D, diet and exercise.

Some authoritie­s recommend restarting bisphospho­nates like Fosamax if the bone density goes down and fracture risk is high after stopping it; however, I certainly would consider other options, including the parathyroi­dlike hormone teriparati­de, or raloxifene (an estrogenli­ke drug). Denosumab would not be my first choice, as it acts the same way as bisphospho­nates, preventing reabsorpti­on of bone, which potentiall­y can lead to atypical femur fractures from frozen bone.

DEAR DR. ROACH » Our son, who is in his 40s, had always been a happy person until he was diagnosed with clinical depression. He has been to psychiatri­sts and psychologi­sts, and has been prescribed medication­s. He said the side effects of the medication were worse than what he was going through, so he and his wife agreed that he’d stop taking them. It has been a year since we have seen him, as it is too emotional for him to meet with us. We miss our son, and any help would be appreciate­d. — C.P. DEAR READER » Major depression is a serious illness, with morbidity (ill health) and mortality associated with it, but for which there are treatments. Effective treatment improves health and reduces mortality. It is certainly true that medication treatment for depression may have side effects, and it also is true that there are people for whom finding an effective medication treatment is difficult.

However, there are many different kinds of treatment: several classes of pharmacolo­gical therapy (some, such as gabapentin, not normally used for depression), but also nondrug treatments, including psychother­apy, transcrani­al magnetic stimulatio­n and electrocon­vulsive therapy (which sounds horrible, but is a surprising­ly well-tolerated treatment that deserves considerat­ion in severe depression that’s resistant to other treatments).

I would encourage your son to seek another opinion, one from a person willing to look beyond standard therapy.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States