The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Privilege dispute arises in Bannon testimony

- By Tom Lobianco, Zeke Miller and Chad Day The Associated Press

The White House’s contention: Pretty much everything is off limits until the president says it’s not.

WASHINGTON » President Donald Trump’s White House is relying on a sweeping interpreta­tion of executive privilege that is rankling members of Congress on both sides of the aisle as current and former advisers parade to Capitol Hill for questionin­g about possible connection­s with Russia.

The White House’s contention: Pretty much everything is off limits until the president says it’s not.

The argument was laid bare this week during former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon’s interview with the House Intelligen­ce Committee. As lawmakers in the closed-door session probed Bannon’s time working for Trump, his attorney got on the phone with the White House counsel’s office, relaying questions and asking what Bannon could tell Congress, according to a White House official and a second person familiar with the interview.

The answer was a broad one. Bannon couldn’t discuss anything to do with his work on the presidenti­al transition or later in the White House itself.

The developmen­t brought to the forefront questions about White House efforts to control what current and former aides may or may not tell Congress about their time in Trump’s inner circle, and whether Republican­s who hold majorities on Capitol Hill will force the issue. It was also the broadest example yet of the White House using executive privilege to limit a witness’ testimony without making a formal invocation of that presidenti­al power.

On Wednesday, White House officials said that the phone calls with the counsel’s office were standard procedure followed by past administra­tions in dealings with Congress. They argued that Bannon, like every current and former member of the administra­tion, starts under the assumption that he is covered by executive privilege and can only answer certain questions unless Trump explicitly says otherwise.

But members of Congress, including Republican­s, criticized the move. The House panel’s top Democrat called it effectivel­y a “gag order.” The committee’s Republican chairman, Devin Nunes of California, served a subpoena on Bannon in an attempt to compel him to answer.

Lawmakers will be closely watching another interview later this week to see how the White House responds. Trump’s longtime spokeswoma­n Hope Hicks is to appear Friday for a closeddoor interview with committee, according to a person familiar with the panel’s work. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the person wasn’t authorized to speak publicly about the matter.

The criticisms echoed those from last summer when Attorney General Jeff Sessions baffled some lawmakers by refusing to answer questions about his conversati­ons with the president, while also maintainin­g he was not citing executive privilege. Following Sessions’ testimony before the Senate Intelligen­ce Committee, Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse said, “As someone who served in the Justice Department, I would love to know what he is talking about.”

Michael Dorf, a constituti­onal law professor at Cornell University, said that while traditiona­lly Congress has required a formal assertion of executive privilege in order for a witness to refuse to answer a question, more recently “we’ve seen people just not answer questions without asserting privilege.”

“It’s kind of a game of separation-of-powers chicken that’s going on there,” he said. “Because nobody knows the full scope of executive privilege — other than that it’s not absolute from the Nixon case — no one really wants to push it.”

Dorf referred to the court case surroundin­g the Supreme Court’s rejection in 1974 of President Richard Nixon’s assertion that he could use executive privilege to prevent the release of tape recordings involving him and other aides. Dorf said it does seem unusual for a witness’ lawyer to consult in real time with the White House about which questions can be answered, it is a “bit more respectful” than a pre-emptive blanket refusal to answer questions.

 ?? JACQUELYN MARTIN — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Former White House strategist Steve Bannon, second from left, is escorted from a House Intelligen­ce Committee meeting where he was interviewe­d behind closed doors on Capitol Hill, Tuesday in Washington.
JACQUELYN MARTIN — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Former White House strategist Steve Bannon, second from left, is escorted from a House Intelligen­ce Committee meeting where he was interviewe­d behind closed doors on Capitol Hill, Tuesday in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States