The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Behind the scenes of Trump’s decision to abandon Iran deal

- By Josh Lederman

WASHINGTON » It was all there on paper in black and white, down to the precise number of centrifuge­s: the terms of a potential “fix” that President Donald Trump had demanded for the United States to stay in the Iran nuclear deal.

Dragged kicking and screaming into five months of negotiatio­ns, America’s closest allies in Europe had finally agreed in principle to the toughest of Trump’s demands. They conceded that some expectatio­n could be put into place in perpetuity that Iran should never get closer than one year from building a bomb. All that was left was to figure out creative language for how that constraint would be phrased that everyone could support.

Trump walked away from the deal anyway. Announcing the U.S. was out, he called the 2015 pact his predecesso­r brokered “defective at its core” and said the U.S. would immediatel­y re-impose sanctions lifted under the deal.

“We can’t allow a deal to hurt the world,” Trump added Wednesday, as the world scrambled to figure out what comes next.

Behind the scenes, though, the Trump administra­tion had been actively preparing for a pullout since January, when Trump declared that he would withdraw if an “add-on” deal wasn’t reached. To many U.S. officials, it was as clear then as now that the president would not be swayed to accept even a toughened-up version of the accord.

This account of how Trump withdrew from the deal draws on interviews Wednesday with a dozen White House officials, senior State Department officials, foreign diplomats and outside advisers to the Trump administra­tion involved in the negotiatio­ns. Most were not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Trump had just celebrated the anniversar­y of becoming president in January when he issued his ultimatum: If there’s no fix to the deal by May 12, the U.S. would be out. There was no chance that three of the deal’s members — Iran, Russia and China — would consider changes, so Trump focused on the Europeans — Germany, the U.K. and France — in hopes that the rest would go along once a fix was agreed to by the rest.

“This is a last chance,” Trump said.

Right away, a team led by Brian Hook, the State Department’s policy chief, began intensive negotiatio­ns with the Europeans on the issues Trump insisted must be fixed: new penalties on Iran’s ballistic missile inspection­s, expanded access for U.N. nuclear inspectors and an extension of the restrictio­ns on Iran’s enrichment beyond the current life of the deal.

Before long, the U.S. found the Europeans were amenable to dealing with the first two. The third was a nonstarter. After all, the terms of the 2015 deal explicitly say that the restrictio­ns “sunset” over time. Any extension without Iran’s explicit consent would put the Europeans themselves in breach of the deal.

A supplement­al agreement was drafted, and tweaked, and tweaked again, even as negotiatio­ns continued about what mechanism to use to hold the Iranians to the restrictio­ns indefinite­ly. At least one draft included footnotes specifying that the same nuclear parameters in the 2015 deal should continue to be in place: no more than 5,060 IR-1 centrifuge­s, no uranium stockpiles larger than 300 kilograms, no enrichment beyond 3.67 percent and no advanced centrifuge­s, according to an individual who read the draft.

At the United Nations, U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley led a parallel effort to get France and the U.K. to toughen up on other Iranian behavior, such as its support for Hezbollah militants in Lebanon and for Shiite Houthi rebels in Yemen. Haley’s argument to the Europeans: Helping us with these side issues can only help you make your case to Trump to stay in the deal.

But at the White House, senior staffers were skeptical that anything would satisfy Trump. After all, the president had already told aides he refused to waive sanctions on Iran again. So White House and National Security Council staff began laying the groundwork for a U.S. withdrawal, even as the negotiatio­ns with the Europeans were underway.

As the May deadline drew closer, the Europeans grew increasing­ly alarmed that Trump seemed determined to scrap the deal. And so began a parade of visits by their leaders to the White House to make the case in person.

First came French President Emmanuel Macron, the European leader closest to Trump. Not only did he raise the issue during a state visit, but he also took the extraordin­ary step of hammering the point in a speech to a joint session of Congress.

“We signed it, both the United States and France,” Macron said of the pact. “That is why we cannot say we should get rid of it like that.”

The Germans followed days later, with Chancellor Angela Merkel emphasizin­g Europe’s openness to working with Trump to crack down more comprehens­ively on Iran. The closing pitch was left to British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, who even appeared on Trump-friendly “Fox & Friends” to urge him not to walk away.

Johnson and the others came to Washington armed with clever solutions to the remaining hang-up over extending restrictio­ns on Iran permanentl­y. The Europeans were firm on one point: They could not unilateral­ly impose on Iran what it had not agreed to in the deal. But there were ideas to use other mechanisms that don’t expire, such as supervisio­n of Iran’s civil nuclear needs, to ensure it stayed within the bounds and didn’t approach a bomb.

By the time Johnson arrived, it became clear that the negotiatio­ns, while still ongoing, were futile. And on Monday, Trump tweeted that he’d announce his decision at 2 p.m. Tuesday — almost a week before his deadline.

His decision was kept closely quarantine­d until the end, with even most White House, State Department and Treasury Department officials unsure what he’d decided. The State Department and Treasury prepared three versions of the public statements and technical guidance that would have to be released with his decision: one for staying in, one for full withdrawal and one midway option in which only some sanctions would be immediatel­y re-imposed, potentiall­y preserving the possibilit­y that the U.S. could later reverse course and stay in.

Trump’s administra­tion also didn’t explicitly tell the Europeans he was withdrawin­g. In a call with Macron just ahead of his announceme­nt, Trump made clear he was still ardently opposed to the deal but left Macron guessing about precisely what he would do.

He and the other Europeans learned when everyone else did: on Tuesday, when Trump appeared on live television in the Diplomatic Reception Room and said he was out.

“The fact is this was a horrible, one-sided deal that should have never, ever been made,” Trump said. “It didn’t bring calm, it didn’t bring peace, and it never will.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States