The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Taliban: Afghanista­n’s future will be different

- By Deb Riechmann and Kathy Gannon

The militants pledged to keep terrorists from using Afghanista­n as a launch pad for attacks against the West.

America’s longest war has come full circle.

The United States began bombing Afghanista­n after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, to root out al-Qaida fighters harbored by the Taliban. Now, more than 18 years later, preventing Afghanista­n from being a launching pad for more attacks on America is at the heart of ongoing U.S. talks with the Taliban.

President Donald Trump’s envoy at the negotiatin­g table says he’s satisfied with the Taliban’s commitment to prevent internatio­nal terrorist organizati­ons from using Afghanista­n as a base to plot global attacks. There’s even talk that a negotiated settlement might result in the Taliban joining the U.S. to fight Islamic State militants, rivals whose footprint is growing in mountainou­s northern Afghanista­n.

“The world needs to be sure that Afghanista­n will not be a threat to the internatio­nal community,” said the envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, who was born in Afghanista­n and is a former U.S. ambassador to Afghanista­n. “We are satisfied with the commitment that we have received (from the Taliban) on counterter­rorism.”

Not everyone is convinced. Some Afghans worry that Trump’s desire to pull American troops from Afghanista­n will override doubts about the Taliban’s sincerity. Early in the talks, Hamdullah Mohib, national security adviser to Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, said counting on the Taliban to control other militants could be like “having cats guard the milk.”

Rep. Michael Waltz, who did multiple combat tours in Afghanista­n as a U.S. special forces officer, said he’s happy to see the Taliban are negotiatin­g but does not see how Afghanista­n can keep from becoming a hotbed for terrorists wanting to strike the United States.

“I have my doubts about the Taliban’s sincerity No. 1,” said Waltz, R-Fla. “But even if you buy into that ... how does the Taliban have the capability to enforce what a 300,000-man Afghan army, the United States forces and a coalition of armies around the world are continuing to struggle to do?”

Much is at stake.

The conflict in Afghanista­n has cost more than 2,300 American lives and hundreds of billions in taxpayer dollars. The Taliban control roughly half the country, although not the cities. About 14,000 U.S. troops plus other NATO-led forces are still there. Senior intelligen­ce officials have warned that a withdrawal could return Afghanista­n to a time when the Taliban ruled a country that was an al-Qaida stronghold.

Despite nearly two decades of war, militant groups remain.

A U.N. Security Council report in April 2018 said al-Qaida was “closely allied with and embedded within the Taliban.” The report said the Taliban, which have no history of conducting attacks outside Afghanista­n, provide operating space for about 20 terrorist groups with thousands of fighters.

Bill Roggio, editor of the Long War Journal at the Foundation for Defense of Democracie­s, a conservati­ve think tank in Washington, cites a video al-Qaida released in May that highlights its alliance with the Taliban and shows an image of militants fighting together under both al-Qaida and Taliban flags.

“The Taliban has not renounced al-Qaida nor is it likely to do so,” Roggio said. “The two remain close allies. The Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden after 9/11 and was willing to sacrifice its control of the country. The Taliban has the upper hand now. There are no incentives to denounce its closest ally.”

A U.S. intelligen­ce official based in Kabul, the Afghan capital, told The Associated Press that the Islamic State group is an even bigger threat. The official, who discussed terrorist threats only on condition of anonymity, said recent IS attacks in Kabul are “practice runs” for more substantia­l ones in the future.

 ??  ??
 ?? JACQUELYN MARTIN — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE ?? Special Representa­tive for Afghanista­n Reconcilia­tion Zalmay Khalilzad poses at the U.S. Institute of Peace, in Washington. America began bombing Afghanista­n after 9/11 to root out al-Qaida fighters, who were being harbored by the Taliban. Nearly 19 years later, Khalilzad says he’s satisfied with the militant group’s pledge to keep terror groups from using Afghanista­n as a launch pad for attacks against the West.
JACQUELYN MARTIN — THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE Special Representa­tive for Afghanista­n Reconcilia­tion Zalmay Khalilzad poses at the U.S. Institute of Peace, in Washington. America began bombing Afghanista­n after 9/11 to root out al-Qaida fighters, who were being harbored by the Taliban. Nearly 19 years later, Khalilzad says he’s satisfied with the militant group’s pledge to keep terror groups from using Afghanista­n as a launch pad for attacks against the West.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States