The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Cologuard test is worth risk of false positive

- Keith Roach

DEAR DR. ROACH

>> I am a 77-yearold man in good health. At my recent annual physical exam, my physician ordered a Cologuard kit to screen for colorectal disease.

I never had problems with my gastrointe­stinal tract.

I had two colonoscop­ies about several years ago, the results were negative.

When I got the kit, I read the patient guidelines and learned that the Cologuard test could result in false positives and that there is an unspecifie­d increase in the risk of false positives for persons over the age of 75.

A positive result from the test requires a followup colonoscop­y, which is also riskier for elderly patients.

Should I do this? ANSWER >> Cologuard is a brand of test that looks at DNA in stool for evidence of cancer.

Certain DNA mutations are highly suggestive of cancer.

In addition, Cologuard does an immunochem­ical test looking for blood.

Because it combines these two techniques, Cologuard is more sensitive than only a test looking for blood.

Compared with colonoscop­y, Cologuard is about 92% sensitive in finding cancers, meaning it will miss about 8%.

With improved sensitivit­y comes a lack of specificit­y, which means you could have a false positive result.

The Cologuard can say that you have an abnormalit­y when a colonoscop­y would indicate normal.

For 45% of people with a positive Cologuard test, no abnormalit­ies will be found upon colonoscop­y.

You are right that false positives are more prevalent in older individual­s.

There are two reasons that I think the Cologuard is still a reasonable choice, despite the fact that it isn’t as good as colonoscop­y.

The first is that I continue to recommend a screening test for healthy 77-year-old men, and although colonoscop­y is my first choice, a normal Cologuard test prevents a need for colonoscop­y, and a false positive would lead to the same colonoscop­y you would have gotten anyway (Although there probably is more anxiety after a false positive test, Would you agree?).

The second is that a person with an abnormal Cologuard and a normal colonoscop­y may be at risk for an abnormalit­y that wasn’t found on colonoscop­y.

A study looking at people in this category found a 25% risk of abnormalit­y on follow-up colonoscop­y, if the Cologuard was abnormal again one to two years later, so it can serve as a warning signal.

Contact Dr. Roach at ToYourGood­Health@med. cornell.edu.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States