The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Weakening FISA is good for country

- Read the editorial from the Toledo Blade at bit. ly/3dNnMtN

It is often said that perfect is the enemy of the good. So while President Trump’s decision to strong-arm the House of Representa­tives into abandoning a bill to reauthoriz­e key provisions of the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act was motivated by his own political feuds, the whole country should be glad to see Congress move on from FISA.

FISA, originally enacted in 1978, has been routinely reauthoriz­ed and expanded by Congress, especially since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Originally meant to surveil potential terrorists and criminals, the law has been used to justify expansive warrantles­s government surveillan­ce programs, as well as an FBI investigat­ion into then-candidate Mr. Trump’s campaign that he contends was unjust.

But, since three authoritie­s of FISA expired in March, Congress has been unable to agree on how to re-up the law. The original move to reauthoriz­e the bill was approved by the House in March, with a bipartisan group of 278 representa­tives voting in favor.

The Senate also approved the reauthoriz­ation but an amendment from Sens. Mike Lee (R., Utah) and Pat Leahy (D., Vt.), which added legal protection­s and review to the FISA court process, sent the bill back to the House.

It was at this point that Mr. Trump threatened that if the legislatio­n were passed, he would use his veto power.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) called on the Democrats to pull the reauthoriz­ation bill. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer did so, an acknowledg­ement that the bill did not have the votes necessary to pass, sending it back to committee.

Mr. Trump’s opposition to the FISA reauthoriz­ation is plainly self-centered.

He feels wronged by how the law was used to surveil his campaign, and he now wants to defang the law so that it cannot happen again.

But, in doing so, warrantles­s surveillan­ce programs supported by FISA would be ended.

This would be a sorely needed win for liberty and privacy, two values that laws like FISA have worked to erode over the past several decades.

Cynics are sure to take issue with Mr. Trump’s motivation for stamping out the FISA reauthoriz­ations, but the country will ultimately be better for weakening this disastrous and dangerous law.

This would be a sorely needed win for liberty and privacy, two values that laws like FISA have worked to erode over the past several decades.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States