The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Convention­s are for pageantry

- Barbara Norrander University of Arizona

In August the Democratic and Republican national convention­s will take on new, uncharted formats. Due to COVID-19 concerns, gone are the mass gatherings in large convention halls, replaced with a switch to mostly online formats.

This is just the latest modificati­on in presidenti­al nominating convention­s since they were first introduced in the 1830s.

Initially, convention­s were insulated meetings of representa­tives from the state parties, with convention delegates on their own determinin­g which candidate became the party’s presidenti­al nominee.

By the early 20th century, convention participan­ts began to receive informatio­n about public preference­s from commercial public opinion polls and a small number of presidenti­al primaries, which constraine­d convention­s in their choice of presidenti­al nominees.

Today’s national convention­s ratify a candidate already chosen by the voters in primaries and caucuses.

George Washington needed no formal nomination, as he was the overwhelmi­ng choice for president among those who would make up the Electoral College.

Subsequent early presidenti­al candidates were nominated by their party’s members in Congress. But if a state did not have a representa­tive from a particular party in Congress, it had no say in the party’s presidenti­al nomination.

In the 1830s, political parties switched to national convention­s, which were meetings of representa­tives from the state parties. Each state was allotted delegates proportion­al to its Electoral College vote, and early convention­s consisted of just a few hundred delegates. These delegates sought to find a popular candidate to head the party’s general election ticket, but had little informatio­n on who this candidate might be.

Candidates’ names were placed into contention by being nominated, and seconded, by a convention delegate. The winning candidate was determined by a series of roll-call votes of state delegation­s that continued until one candidate won the required number of delegates.

Candidates did not attend the convention­s; the norm of the day was that politician­s were not to openly campaign for the presidency. Instead, managers of the various candidates bargained with state party leaders to accumulate the required number of delegates.

Party platforms were introduced in the 1840s.

In the 20th century, informatio­n about public preference­s became available, which would help delegates to determine who would be their party’s most popular presidenti­al candidate.

Early in the century, a handful of states adopted presidenti­al primaries to select delegates, though most states continued to use traditiona­l methods such as appointmen­t by state or local party leaders or selection at local caucuses. Thus, the vast majority of 20th century convention delegates remained representa­tives of their state parties, not supporters of specific candidates.

An early use of presidenti­al primaries in 1912 proved disastrous. Former President Theodore Roosevelt ran for president again, won 10 of the 13 presidenti­al primaries and was favored by the progressiv­e wing of the Republican Party.

But the majority of Republican convention delegates were party regulars who supported the current president William Taft instead. In addition, by this time a new norm had taken hold, to renominate sitting presidents.

Roosevelt lost the Republican nomination, founded the Progressiv­e Party in protest, was nominated by that party and split the Republican vote in the fall general election, allowing Democrat Woodrow Wilson to win.

With the divisive results from the 1912 Republican convention and the waning of the Progressiv­e Movement, which championed state adoption of primary laws, presidenti­al primaries went out of favor.

In the middle of the 20th century, typically only 15 states held presidenti­al primaries, selecting only one-third of the convention’s delegates. Few candidates ran in these presidenti­al primaries, as primaries were not seen as a successful pathway to the nomination.

Other changes came to 20thcentur­y convention­s. Franklin Roosevelt was the first presidenti­al nominee to attend a convention when he gave an acceptance speech in 1932, broadcast nationally by radio.

Presidenti­al primaries became somewhat more influentia­l after World War II, when some candidates adopted a strategy of running in presidenti­al primaries. Other candidates avoided running in primaries and relied on a traditiona­l strategy of courting the party’s elite who would be delegates at the convention.

Running in presidenti­al primaries was a risky strategy: A candidate who lost in a primary could see their presidenti­al bid end.

Hubert Humphrey, in 1968, became the last candidate nominated for president without running in any of the presidenti­al primaries.

Today’s convention­s are ratifying rather than nominating convention­s. Their main contributi­on is to bring the party together in support of their nominee.

Once begun as places to make deals and deliberate on possible candidates and positions, today’s convention­s are public relations events, stressing the character, issues and strong party support for the party’s presidenti­al ticket.

The Conversati­on is an independen­t and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States