The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

What you’ll get with Biden economic plan

The Democratic convention case against President Trump boils down to COVID and character, and the polls suggest it’s working.

-

But the bigger issue next year will be reviving the economy from the shutdown recession, and on that score the Democrats are mostly quiet. Perhaps that’s because Joe Biden is promising to repeat the same policy mix that produced the slowest recovery in modern times during the Obama years. The record is worth examining.

Mr. Biden’s cheerleade­rs declare the Obama Administra­tion a smashing economic success. They say he inherited the deepest recession since the Great Depression, and handed President Trump the longest expansion on record. Mr. Obama did get some things right. He tolerated the shale energy revolution that emerged on his watch, albeit on private land. Only late in his term did he try to strangle it with pipeline bans and regulation. Despite conflictin­g instincts on trade policy, he also pushed for progress on major multilater­al trade deals with Europe and around the Pacific.

But the overall economic numbers tell a negative story. Annual economic growth, adjusted for inflation, averaged 2.3% after the recession ended in June 2009 across Mr. Obama’s two terms. Despite the length of the post-2009 expansion, it was shallow.

Sluggish growth went handin-hand with the worst labor recovery in generation­s. The unemployme­nt rate peaked at 10% in October 2009 and didn’t reach the pre-recession level of 4.4% until March 2017. That painfully slow healing overstates the improvemen­t since so many dropped out of the workforce.

Mr. Obama’s contributi­on was to make the Main Street recovery more difficult with mistakes the Biden Democrats seem set on repeating. Chief among these was the $800 billion “stimulus” spending bill in 2009 that was supposed to galvanize a rapid recovery. But the shovel-ready projects weren’t ready. Most of the money was spent on income and social-worker transfer payments that did nothing to change incentives to work and invest.

The payments also penalized work in the name of supporting laid-off workers. One signature policy was a significan­t extension of unemployme­nt benefits, to 99 weeks, that paid people not to work long after the recession ended. Sound familiar?

Casey Mulligan of the University of Chicago added up the various benefits and estimated the marginal tax rate created by the phase-out of benefits as workers earned more rose to 48% from 40% before the recession. Mr. Mulligan argues these labor-market distortion­s bear most of the responsibi­lity for the depth and length of what he calls the “redistribu­tion recession.”

Another lesson is how quickly the Obama Democrats pivoted from recovery to social revolution, and how destructiv­e that pivot was. With the Affordable Care Act, Mr. Obama and Speaker Nancy Pelosi reorganize­d one-sixth of the economy. The law’s combinatio­n of tax hikes, regulatory diktats and the uncertaint­y attendant on “passing the law to learn what’s in it” hobbled the recovery.

Now Mr. Biden is promising to repeat this, but on a grander scale in health care and his version of a Green New Deal.

Note that one political consequenc­e of these policy failures was to lean more heavily on monetary policy to salvage a recovery from Mr. Obama’s bad instincts, and the Federal Reserve created distortion­s to do so.

By refusing to normalize monetary policy after the financial panic ended, the Ben Bernanke-Janet Yellen Fed inflated asset bubbles on stock exchanges, in corporate debt markets, urban property markets, and other parts of the world. These booms mainly benefited asset owners at the expense of wage earners and entreprene­urs. The result was a damaging form of inequality, new in America, that rewarded asset ownership or political connection­s instead of innovation and hard work.

The Biden economic plan is best understood as Obamanomic­s pulled left by Bernie Sanders. He’d raise taxes by $3 trillion by his count—about $4 trillion by independen­t calculatio­ns. His spending plans run to at least $7.4 trillion, conservati­vely estimated.

The U.S. economy will have a growth spurt in 2021 as the pandemic ends no matter who wins the election. But over time these destructiv­e policies will inevitably lead to slower growth. The Fed will be called to do even more, perhaps including bond purchases of private companies and modern monetary theory’s debt monetizati­on. Asset holders will benefit more than wage earners.

This may not matter in the election, since Democrats and Donald Trump both want to make this a referendum on Donald Trump. But voters should be under no illusions about what they’re buying in the Biden agenda, and under no fog of amnesia concerning what happened the last time.

— Wall Street Journal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States