The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Is Biden dismantlin­g border security?

- Ryan Smith is a communicat­ions profession­al based in Washington, DC. He has worked for The Heritage Foundation, the RNC, and on Capitol Hill. He wrote this for InsideSour­ces.

President Joe Biden has long made it clear he intends for immigratio­n reform to be a top priority of his administra­tion.

On his first day in office, he signed a stack of executive actions designed to dismantle the Trump administra­tion’s immigratio­n policy and institute new priorities. He ended constructi­on of the border wall, imposed a 100-day deportatio­n freeze, and released an immigratio­n plan opponents call an “amnesty.”

Biden’s plan even sanitizes the language, directing the DHS to change all future uses of “illegal immigrant” and “alien” to the more benign “noncitizen.”

Many of these changes are cosmetic. But according to Jessica Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies at the Center for Immigratio­n Studies, a fundamenta­l change in immigratio­n is underway, a change that members of America’s border security agencies say could bring even more changes to our immigratio­n system.

“I’ve heard from multiple sources that dismantlin­g ICE and ending its enforcemen­t role was discussed by [Department of Homeland Security secretary] Alejandro Mayorkas at a town hall meeting for ICE staff in San Antonio,” Vaughan told InsideSour­ces. “The apparent purpose of this reorganiza­tion is to abolish immigratio­n enforcemen­t by starving the agency of resources, personnel, and authority, and at the same time stifle internal resistance by busting the deportatio­n officers union.”

Vaughan’s report was confirmed to InsideSour­ces by a border enforcemen­t official. Speaking on background, the source said border agents are demoralize­d by the anti-enforcemen­t approach of the Biden administra­tion.

“It’s gonna be a disaster. Because what appears to us is they’re going to dismantle standard immigratio­n enforcemen­t, but they’re going to do it under the guise of allowing ICE to expand its mission,” the source said. “What they’re saying is ‘we don’t want you to focus on identifyin­g illegal aliens. We want you to focus on criminal investigat­ions.’

“Most people don’t understand the majority of immigratio­n law is administra­tive. That’s the reason ICE is able to make so many arrests. But if you make everything criminal that means every alien that we arrest now that’s a federal criminal case.”

And that, critics say, will bring basic border enforcemen­t to a standstill. “It takes months to work up a case and then present it to the courts,” the source said. “Our enforcemen­t work has come to an absolute standstill.”

It’s a sign of the outsized influence the so-called “Justice Democrats” like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have over the Democratic Party and by extension, the Biden administra­tion. Their rallying cry on immigratio­n has been “abolish ICE” and #NotOneMore [deportatio­n], and this potential plan by the White House could be the first step toward those goals.

The DHS declined to respond to requests for comment from InsideSour­ces.

These outcomes are in line with the immigratio­n policy fact sheet released by the White House on Biden’s first day in office. Biden’s proposals are the basis for The Bicameral U.S. Citizenshi­p Act of 2021 is sponsored by Sen. Bob Mendez (DNJ) in the Senate and Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) in the House. If passed, this legislatio­n could effectivel­y grant citizenshi­p to 11 million currently undocument­ed immigrants.

Critics of the legislatio­n find three elements particular­ly problemati­c: The eight-year path to citizenshi­p, the lack of any kind of substantiv­e border security, and measures to boost chain migration.

The Citizenshi­p Act would shorten the citizenshi­p process to eight years and allow illegal immigrants to apply for green cards after only five. Jessica Anderson, executive director at Heritage Action for America, wrote, “These actions from the new administra­tion incentiviz­e illegal immigratio­n. By clearing the path to citizenshi­p, the bill would encourage more people than ever to make it across the border. This faster green card process for children will encourage parents to take their small kids on the dangerous journey on which hundreds of migrants can die each year.”

As illegal border crossings are incentiviz­ed, critics of the bill are concerned by its lack of border security measures. When Biden ended the national emergency that was funding border wall constructi­on, the White House claimed it preferred “smart border controls” to the physical barriers championed by the Trump administra­tion.

The bill’s lack of any new provisions for increased security likely makes it a nonstarter by Republican­s. They want to see policies like identifica­tion requiremen­ts or background checks, and a mandate for businesses to use the e-Verify system.

Once a migrant is admitted and receives a green card, chain migration would be made even simpler.

Many would be exempted from annual per-country caps on employment-based green cards and family-based green cards. Family-based green cards would also be extended to include spouses, children under 21 years old, and partners in LGBT unions. The fact sheet specifical­ly focuses on this last point saying, “the bill further supports families [sic] by more explicitly including permanent partnershi­ps and eliminatin­g discrimina­tion facing LGBTQ+ families.”

Biden has made many changes to immigratio­n policy. As he supports the Bicameral U.S. Citizenshi­p Act of 2021 and appears to favor the incrementa­l abolition of ICE, his administra­tion faces an uphill battle to win Republican support for reform.

 ??  ?? Ryan E. Smith
Ryan E. Smith

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States