The News Herald (Willoughby, OH)

Dirty tricks have gotten more sophistica­ted

- Hans A. von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation. He is the co-author of “Our Broken Election: How the Left Changed the Way You Vote.” He wrote this for InsideSour­ces.com.

June 17 marks the 50th anniversar­y of the night when D.C. police arrested five men breaking into the Watergate hotel/office/apartment complex.

The burglars were operatives of President Richard Nixon’s re-election campaign. Their mission: to tap phones and steal documents from the Democratic National Committee, which had its headquarte­rs in the Watergate.

The operation was planned and supervised by G. Gordon Liddy, a former FBI agent who was the general counsel of the president’s campaign. He financed the caper with campaign funds. Liddy and the burglars were criminally charged and convicted. Others who participat­ed in the subsequent cover-up orchestrat­ed by the White House, including John Ehrlichman, Nixon’s adviser for domestic affairs.

The investigat­ion of the attempted Watergate break-in by a select committee chaired by Sen. Sam Ervin of North Carolina eventually led to the White House audiotapes, the infamous 18-minute gap, and House Judiciary Committee approval of three articles of impeachmen­t. Nixon resigned August 8, 1974, to avoid a vote by the House and a potential impeachmen­t trial in the Senate.

A month later, President Gerald Ford pardoned Nixon, saying his action was intended to end a “long national nightmare” and a disruptive scandal that had polarized the public. He feared that potential litigation against the former president would arouse “ugly passions” and challenge the “credibilit­y of our free institutio­ns of government … at home and abroad.”

So, have things gotten better since then? Liddy and his fellow co-conspirato­rs were driven by political objectives — to find out everything they could about what the Democratic Party was doing and to get informatio­n that they could use to sabotage George McGovern’s presidenti­al campaign. But they got caught because of their ineptness.

Compare that to what we now know happened in the 2016 presidenti­al campaign. The Hillary Clinton presidenti­al campaign — using campaign lawyers, an opposition research firm and allies in the press — orchestrat­ed a smear campaign against Donald Trump. The concocted hoax about his supposed collusion with the Russian government continued well into his presidency.

The Clinton campaign didn’t have to engage bumbling burglars for a risky wiretappin­g scheme. Instead, as the special counsel, the Justice Department’s inspector general, and the John Durham investigat­ion have revealed, they created a salacious “dossier” rife with phony claims. They enlisted the help of a technology executive and university researcher­s with government cybersecur­ity contracts to secretly scoop up internet communicat­ions data from Trump during the campaign and from the White House itself after he became president. The sophistica­tion of this conspiracy makes Gordon Liddy look like an amateur.

Even the FBI got entangled in this dirty political trick, leading the nation’s most powerful law enforcemen­t agency to abuse its authority under the Foreign Intelligen­ce Surveillan­ce Act to spy on people connected to the opposition presidenti­al campaign. This, in turn, led to the expensive, unjustifie­d two-year investigat­ion by Special Counsel Bob Mueller that hampered Trump (and his advisers) in carrying out his presidenti­al duties.

In 1972, Nixon’s dirty trick failed, and Liddy and his co-conspirato­rs all went to prison. The Clinton campaign’s dirty trick failed to win the election. Still, it succeeded in hobbling the Trump presidency and corrupting the Justice Department. Yet no one has gone to prison as a result of what happened in 2016. The cover-up was so successful that we didn’t even know about the illegal spying and politiciza­tion of Justice until well after it occurred and the dirty deed was done.

So, what have we learned in the 50 years since Watergate? Dirty tricksters in politics have become more adept at hiding what they are doing, abusing advances in technology to further their dishonest ends, weaponizin­g federal law enforcemen­t agencies against their political opponents, and using their friends in the media to ensure they are successful.

Americans deserve better. And unfortunat­ely, the dirty tricks in the last presidenti­al campaign have done what Gerald Ford feared: raised “ugly passions,” polarized the electorate, and damaged the “credibilit­y of our free institutio­ns of government … at home and abroad.”

 ?? ?? Hans von Spakovsky
Hans von Spakovsky

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States