The News-Times (Sunday)

‘We could expand absentee-ballot access right now’

- All voter’s Matt Blumenthal is state representa­tive for the Connecticu­t General Assembly’s 147th District, serving Stamford and Darien.

Last fall, Connecticu­t residents voted absentee in unpreceden­ted numbers. COVID-19 provided the legal justificat­ion for expanding absentee-ballot access. But voters embraced it because it is convenient, safe, and secure.

The results spoke for themselves: turnout increased to a record-breaking 79.7 percent. Lines at polling places were reduced. Voters — especially those who voted absentee — overwhelmi­ngly reported satisfacti­on with their experience.

Why don’t we do this every election? The short answer: currently, “noexcuse” absentee balloting is against the law. Our state Constituti­on lists certain limited, approved reasons to obtain an absentee ballot. As a result, we need a Constituti­onal amendment to allow absentee voting outside those reasons. On the Government Administra­tion and Elections Committee, we are considerin­g one right now. That’s great, and hopefully we’ll pass it.

But even if we do, amending our state Constituti­on requires a special process that takes years to complete — perhaps as many as five. Not for nothing are we called The Land of Steady Habits.

Here’s what people aren’t talking about: we could expand absentee-ballot access right now. As restrictiv­e as our state Constituti­on is, our absenteeba­llot statutes are even more so. By expanding the statutory reasons to obtain an absentee ballot to their Constituti­onal limits, we can ensure thousands and thousands more Connecticu­t voters can convenient­ly and securely cast their vote. And statutes can be changed simply by passing a bill passed through the General Assembly with the governor’s signature.

That’s why I proposed H.B. 6205, An Act Revising Certain Absentee Voting Statutes.

Here’s how it works. The current statute requires voters to be absent “during

of the hours of voting” to obtain an absentee ballot. But the state Constituti­on does not — they may obtain absentee ballots if they are merely “unable to appear at the polling place on the day of election because of absence” from their city or town. Likewise, the relevant statute specifies that a voter must obtain an absentee ballot only for the sickness or disability. But the Constituti­on does not specify whose sickness or disability matters: the sickness or disability may be that of a family member or a patient.

This has dramatic — and absurd — real-world consequenc­es. Right now, thousands of commuters must either stay out of town all day until past 8 p.m. to get an absentee ballot, or be at the mercy of traffic or train schedules, racing back from work trying to get to the polls in time. A home health worker who goes from a daytime shift to take care of his own family has no chance to go to the polls — and cannot vote absentee. Someone who cannot leave her disabled mother to go to the polls cannot get an absentee ballot. These people are all simply disenfranc­hised.

Under H.B. 6205, all these people — commuters, health care workers, caretakers — would be eligible to obtain an absentee ballot. And the law could go into effect before the municipal elections this fall.

H.B. 6205 is not a panacea — we still need a constituti­onal amendment to permit full no-excuse absentee voting and allow all citizens to participat­e convenient­ly in our elections. But it would allow many more Connecticu­t voters absentee-ballot access while the amendment process progresses. And we have strong evidence it is Constituti­onal: the Governor’s Executive Order (and our statute codifying it) allowing everyone to vote absentee because of COVID-19 interprete­d the Constituti­on’s “sickness” excuse broadly in much the way H.B. 6205 does, and was approved by the Connecticu­t Supreme Court.

We have no time to lose. The right to vote is one of the most sacred American rights, enshrined in both our federal and state constituti­ons. “Where there is disenfranc­hisement,” our state Supreme Court has declared, “a grievous wrong is done to the citizen.”

Unfortunat­ely, our state has a long history of disenfranc­hisement through unduly restrictiv­e absenteevo­ting laws. Absentee voting first came to Connecticu­t in 1864, when the state Constituti­on was amended after our Union soldiers were barred from mailing in their votes from the front. Those too sick or disabled to go to the polls were first allowed an absentee ballot only in 1932. Those whose religious dictates barred election-day voting have been allowed an absentee ballot only since 1964. Today, our absentee-ballot laws are some of the most restrictiv­e in the country.

Voting is a fundamenta­l right. To redeem it, we must make voting safe, convenient, and secure for every citizen — and do so as quickly as possible. This session, the General Assembly must pass a resolution for a Constituti­onal amendment to allow noexcuse absentee balloting. But we should also pass a bill that will immediatel­y allow the maximum possible absentee-ballot access. We should pass H.B. 6205.

 ?? Grace Duffield/Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? A ballot box in New Canaan for primaries in August.
Grace Duffield/Hearst Connecticu­t Media A ballot box in New Canaan for primaries in August.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States