The News-Times

The right finds the perfect weapon against the left

- Tyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He is a professor of economics at George Mason University.

Imagine the perfect political and intellectu­al weapon. It would disable your adversarie­s by preoccupyi­ng them with their own vanities and squabbles, a bit like a drug so good that users focus on the high and stop everything else they are doing.

Such a weapon exists: It is called political correctnes­s. But it is not a weapon against white men or conservati­ves, as is frequently alleged; rather, it is a weapon against the American left. To put it simply, the American left has been hacked, and it is now running in a circle of its own choosing, rather than focusing on electoral victories or policy effectiven­ess. Too many segments of the Democratic Party are self-righteousl­y talking about identity politics, and they are letting other priorities slip.

Of course there is a lot of racism out there, which makes political correctnes­s all the more tempting. Yet polling data suggests that up to 80 percent of Americans are opposed to politicall­y correct thinking in its current manifestat­ions. Latinos and Asian-Americans are among the groups most opposed, and even 61 percent of selfprofes­sed liberals do not like political correctnes­s.

The PC weapon reared its head again this week when Sen. Elizabeth Warren made a big show of her genealogic­al test showing she is some small part Native American. To someone immersed in the political correctnes­s debates, this obsession with identity might seem entirely natural. But the actual reality is more brutal.

The reality is that many Americans already think that the Democrats talk too much about identity. Warren would have done better to drop the topic altogether, as both right-wing and leftwing critics agree.

Instead, she has kept the identity issue in the limelight, and reminded Americans that elite, mostly Democratic-leaning institutio­ns, such as Harvard, like to pat themselves on the back for their diversity in ways which seem phony to most of the rest of us.

So if you are a right-wing, conservati­ve, or perhaps libertaria­n thinker, and you consider yourself an opponent of political correctnes­s, I have a message: Political correctnes­s, as a movement, is a winning issue for you.

It is disabling some of the ideas you don't like. You might want to celebrate in secret, but celebrate you should.

Here's another ugly truth. The biggest day-today losers from the political correctnes­s movement are other left-of-center people, most of all white moderate Democrats, especially those in universiti­es. If you really believe that “the PC stuff” is irrational and out of control and making institutio­ns dysfunctio­nal, and that universiti­es are full of left-of-center people, well who is going to suffer most of the costs?

It will be people in the universiti­es, and in unjust and indiscrimi­nate fashion.

That means more liberals than conservati­ves, if only because the latter are relatively scarce on the ground.

Another bout of political correctnes­s is about to dominate the headlines, and that is the lawsuit against Harvard for allegedly discrimina­ting against Asian-Americans in its admissions decisions. Whatever you think Harvard did, or however the court rules, this issue is not a winner for the left. It at least appears to pit the interests of Asian-Americans against those of African-Americans, and thus it fractures what might otherwise be a winning coalition for Democrats. It makes a mockery out of phrases such as “people of color,” because in this case like many others the aggregatio­n obscures some very real and important difference­s. The lawsuit also will remind Americans that attempts to be more fair to one group will, in practice, involve hypocrisy and unfair treatment toward other groups, in this case the Asian-Americans who found it much harder to get into Harvard because they were not a targeted minority.

Every time identity politics is in the headlines — rather than, say, wages or health care — Donald Trump's re-election chances go up. As Tony Blair said recently: “If you put right-wing populism against left populism, right-wing populism will win.”

To be clear, lest you think I focus too much on the failures of the left: I now wonder if, in the internet era, every political movement is hackable.

Political involvemen­t requires a certain kind of ideologica­l motivation, and ideologies are imperfectl­y rational.

So a smart hacker can redirect the attention of groups in other, less productive directions. Just put some inflammato­ry words or video on the internet and you can induce the left to talk more about identity politics.

Has the right-wing been hacked? I suspect so. The president himself is part of the hack, and the core motivation is the desire to “own the libs,” a phrase I didn't hear much five years ago.

We've now entered an era in which too many are self-obsessed and too few are effective.

Another bout of political correctnes­s is about to dominate the headlines, and that is the lawsuit against Harvard for allegedly discrimina­ting against Asian-Americans in its admissions decisions.

 ?? Charles Krupa / Associated Press ?? Rowers paddle down the Charles River past Cambridge campus of Harvard University.
Charles Krupa / Associated Press Rowers paddle down the Charles River past Cambridge campus of Harvard University.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States