The News-Times

COVID puts billions of dollars in state projects in jeopardy

- By Keith M. Phaneuf

As legislator­s fled the Capitol as the coronaviru­s spread through Connecticu­t last March, they failed to approve the annual limit on the state’s credit card — a seemingly routine task, but one whose absence now jeopardize­s billions of dollars in planned projects.

It’s unclear whether lawmakers will address this oversight later this month when they return to Hartford for a special legislativ­e session, or defer action until after the November elections. Their ability to postpone delivering the bad news ultimately hinges on Connecticu­t’s cash position remaining strong and having other resources on hand to pay the bills.

“Bluntly, we are ignoring what we know to be the reality of the current situation,” Deputy House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora, D-North Branford, wrote recently in a letter to legislativ­e leaders. “The sooner we face reality, the sooner we can start to plan to address this enormous challenge.”

Connecticu­t borrows billions of dollars annually for capital projects by selling bonds on Wall Street. But there is a borrowing limit and it’s tied to the revenues the state expects to receive each year. As expectatio­ns for tax receipts and other resources shrink, so does the debt limit.

Revenue forecasts were high when lawmakers left the Capitol on March 11, to allow for a four-day deep cleaning of the complex. Had the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee — before it left — approved a revenue schedule for the fiscal year beginning July 1, the debt limit would have been set high as well.

But lawmakers, who expected to return to the Capitol the following Monday, never came back because COVID-19 infections rapidly spread. Leaders indefinite­ly postponed business, and since then, state analysts have dramatical­ly lowered their revenue projection­s by more than $2 billion — for this fiscal year and for each of the next two.

Over three years the combined reduction approaches $7 billion, according to an April 30 report. The projection­s reflect the fact that more than 600,000 Connecticu­t residents became unemployed as the pandemic shuttered thousands of businesses or forced them to scale back operations.

Some of the revenue drop is temporary. Gov. Ned Lamont deferred income, corporatio­n and other state tax filing deadlines from April 15 until mid-July to assist struggling Connecticu­t households and companies – a move praised by lawmakers from both parties.

But Candelora said Connecticu­t, nonetheles­s, clearly has to scale back its borrowing now.

State law caps not only the outstandin­g bond debt the state can carry at any given time, but also how much new bonding legislator­s can tentativel­y schedule for future approved projects waiting in line to receive financing.

By law, when the state gets within 90 percent of the debt limit, the governor must craft a plan to immediatel­y reduce planned borrowing below that threshold. If debt exceeds 100 percent, then all borrowing is shut down.

State Treasurer Shawn T. Wooden warned recently that were the finance committee to adopt a revenue schedule that matched the recent April 30 forecast, Connecticu­t would be within 99.3 percent of its debt limit. Lamont and legislator­s would need to postpone $2.2 billion in planned borrowing to get down to the 90 percent threshold.

Legislator­s routinely authorize borrowing for projects months or even years before the state actually borrows the funds to carry them out. The State Bond Commission also has to endorse a project before it is financed, and in some cases, initiative­s approved by the legislatur­e never receive funding.

But this doesn’t stop lawmakers from touting the project as soon as the General Assembly gives its OK, particular­ly if it involves a project earmarked for a legislator’s home district. Nor does it stop Wall Street credit rating agencies from considerin­g these legislativ­e authorizat­ions when assessing Connecticu­t’s credit worthiness.

Wooden said Thursday that “certain caution is still warranted,” involving the debt cap. “We continue to take careful note of the matter.”

Caution is needed because Connecticu­t doesn’t borrow money only to finance capital projects. When the state’s cash balance is low, the treasurer may temporaril­y shift bond proceeds into the common cash pool so the state can pay its operating bills. The treasurer’s office was forced to make several such transfers during the last recession, but Wooden has said Connecticu­t’s cash position, to date, has been strong.

But if cash reserves run low before the November elections, Connecticu­t may need to borrow funds. To facilitate that, legislator­s first would need to reset the state’s debt limit. And to do that, apparently, Lamont and legislator­s would need to put billions of dollars’ worth of projects on hold — at the worst time from a political standpoint.

Connecticu­t ranks among the most indebted states, per capita, in the nation, and debt service costs consume more than 10 percent of the annual budget, a problem that prompted Lamont to press for his debt diet immediatel­y upon taking office in January 2019. To date, though, the governor’s fellow Democrats in the legislatur­e’s majority have balked at that diet.

Chris McClure, spokesman for Lamont’s budget office, said “if the legislatur­e adopts a new schedule, and adjustment­s are needed, we will work with them to find the best possible solution. If that includes necessary adjustment­s to bond authorizat­ions, we are able to do so at any time–including in the next regular session.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States