The News-Times

Benefits of flu vaccine outweigh risks

- Readers may email questions to: ToYourGood­Health@med .cornell.edu or mail questions to 628 Virginia Dr., Orlando, FL 32803.

Dear Dr. Roach: I am a paraplegic due to complicati­ons from the West Nile virus. I am getting conflictin­g informatio­n from my health care providers concerning flu shots. My primary care doctor says that the flu shots are contraindi­cated for West Nile victims; my pharmacist says the vaccinatio­ns are OK; and my hematologi­st is unsure. I would like to get a flu shot and a vaccinatio­n for COVID-19 when available.

P.H.L.

Answer:

West Nile virus was relatively unknown in the U.S. until 1999, when an outbreak occurred in New York, but WNV now has been found in all the continenta­l states and Canadian provinces. It is an arbovirus, related to the Japanese encephalit­is virus. As such, it can cause neurologic­al symptoms, including meningitis and encephalit­is. It may also cause an acute flaccid paralysis, similar to poliomyeli­tis. Only polio virus causes poliomyeli­tis, and polio only exists in the wild in Afghanista­n and Pakistan now, but several viruses can cause symptoms that act similarly. A third of people with acute flaccid paralysis do not recover.

There is no definitive answer on flu shots, because it’s an unusual situation and there are little data. However, I found no published informatio­n that would lead me to recommend against a flu vaccine in people with neurologic­al compromise due to West Nile virus. I suspect your primary doctor is concerned because there is a syndrome from West Nile similar to Guillain-Barre, about which there is controvers­y about flu vaccines.

It is very unlikely that you have paraplegia from a Guillain-Barre syndrome from West Nile.

Even if you did, the benefits of influenza vaccine outweigh the risk, according to multiple studies.

I cannot comment on any COVID-19 vaccine until efficacy and safety data from large studies are available, which is not the case as of this writing.

Dear Dr. Roach: Is there a way to do a noninvasiv­e, easily reversible vasectomy?

K.M.B.

Answer: Vasectomy is a safe and highly effective procedure to assure permanent male sterility. Although the preferred technique in the U.S. is a no-scalpel vasectomy, in my opinion, it cannot be considered noninvasiv­e. Minimally invasive is a more correct term.

Complicati­ons are uncommon, and include infection and post-vasectomy pain syndrome (both less than 1% with the no-scalpel method). The overall rate of pregnancy after vasectomy is approximat­ely 1 in 2,000.

Vasectomy is for men who want permanent sterility: They are sure they never want children again. Men should not think of a vasectomy as a reversible procedure. Neverthele­ss, reversal of vasectomy is still sometimes attempted. In the best of hands, the success rate is 50% to 70%. Consequent­ly, careful counseling is mandatory prior to vasectomy. Also, men need to know that although a successful vasectomy protects against pregnancy, it does not protect against sexually transmitte­d infections.

Most men tolerate the procedure quite well. Some of my patients have noted post-procedure pain, but a few days of light activity and pain relievers is generally adequate. One or two have had unexpected­ly high amounts of pain requiring more potent pain relievers for a few days.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States