The News-Times

Delays, labor costs make for pricey transit projects

- Jim Cameron COMMENTARY

Why is transporta­tion constructi­on so expensive in our area? What kind of honor was it when New York City recently surpassed Zurich (one of the most expensive cities in the world) as No. 1 on the most-expensivep­lace-to-do-undergroun­d-constructi­on dishonor roll?

The highly respected Regional Plan Associatio­n has studied that question and offers some explanatio­ns and frightenin­g examples. Focusing on three recent MTA mega-projects in New York City — the Second Avenue Subway, the #7 subway extension to Manhattan’s west side and the LIRR’s East Side Access project — their findings make for depressing reading.

Let’s focus on the ESA plan, an ambitious project to construct new rail tunnels under Park Avenue and a new rail station 10 storeys beneath Grand Central to serve LIRR trains. This is an important project for Connecticu­t as it will eventually allow some Metro-North trains to run across the Hells Gate Bridge to Penn Station. Once estimated to cost $4.3 billion and to be finished by 2009, ESA may not be finished until 2022 at a total cost of $12.2 billion. So, what happened?

The RPA report says the project was initially pushed by politician­s who grossly underestim­ated the initial budget just to get it approved. Because MetroNorth and the LIRR (both part of the MTA) operate as silos, they had trouble coordinati­ng their efforts. Worst of all, the procuremen­t process and contract writing was a mess, adding four years of delays.

Though the ESA project was huge in cost, it was small in distance — only 3.5 miles of new tunnels and track. But it involved boring huge tunnels through bedrock and ended up building the most expensive mile of railroad track in the world at over $3 billion. One big culprit was labor.

In 2010, auditors found that 900 workers were each being paid about $1,000 a day though only 700 workers were needed for the job. Nobody could explain what the other 200 workers were doing every day, aside from getting rich.

An investigat­ion by the New York Times blamed the cozy relationsh­ip between labor unions and politician­s, consultant­s who hired MTA bosses to gain more work and contractor­s and vendors regularly inflating their bids by 15 to 25 percent for what’s known as “the MTA factor,” i.e. the hassles of working with that agency.

Jobs like running the tunnel boring machines were staffed with 25 workers on the ESA project, about triple the number employed on the same equipment overseas. Elevators at the constructi­on site each had an human operator even though they ran automatica­lly. Crane operators also had an “oiler,” an unneeded throwback to older times. All told, staffing for undergroun­d constructi­on in New York City was quadruple that of similar jobs abroad.

The labor unions push back saying the work is dirty and dangerous and their members live in one of the most expensive cities in the world, so they deserve more.

The RPA report also cites other problems including lengthy environmen­tal reviews (up to seven years versus two years in Europe), insurance and liability roadblocks, flawed project designs causing frequent and expensive change orders and a lack of post-project reviews to learn from mistakes.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States