The News-Times

The good news about Connecticu­t and debt

- By Sean Goldrick Sean Goldrick retired from a career investing in internatio­nal equities. He also served four years on the Greenwich finance board, the Board of Estimate and Taxation.

For years, conservati­ve commentato­rs and journalist­s have been claiming that Connecticu­t is drowning in debt and unfunded pension liabilitie­s. A series in the CT Mirror claimed that the state suffers from “a legacy of debt.” The truth, however, is that Connecticu­t's balance sheet stands in much better fiscal shape than these commentato­rs claim, and is steadily improving.

Let's break down the numbers, starting with Connecticu­t's bonded debt. But first, to understand Connecticu­t's fiscal situation, one has to be aware of a critical fact: Connecticu­t has no county government.

Connecticu­t is one of just two states without functionin­g county-level government, having done away with counties in the 1960s. When county government­s were eliminated, Connecticu­t was left with a state government and 169 mostly small municipali­ties and a few small cities, and 172 mostly small public school districts. Those municipali­ties and school districts were simply incapable of taking on the functions previously handled by counties. So state government stepped in. The result is that Connecticu­t's state government looks large in comparison with states that operate county government­s. But our municipali­ties and small cities hold less debt and are lighter staffed compared with the municipal sectors of other states. That relationsh­ip is reflected in the fact that each year between a quarter and a third of the state's general obligation bond proceeds go to support municipali­ties. In particular, the state government plays a large role in funding school constructi­on, which is rarely a state obligation elsewhere.

According to a December 2021 analysis by the Connecticu­t Office of Policy and Management, our combined state and municipal bonded debt relative to state personal income of 19 percent ranks Connecticu­t 40th among the 50 states. We're virtually tied with Texas and Washington, which rank 39th and 38th respective­ly. Massachuse­tts and California feature slightly higher levels of debt to personal income, while New York features the highest debt to personal income of the 50 states. So Connecticu­t's relative debt is higher than average, but by no means is it drowning in debt.

Now look closer. Connecticu­t's state-issued debt, at 15 percent of state personal income, ranks third highest in the nation. But the flip side reveals that municipal debt, at just 4 percent of personal income, ranks lower than all but three states, and is virtually identical to two others.

Compare us with Texas, which loudly boasts of being a “low tax state,” and one sees that Texas's combined municipal and state debt to personal income is identical with Connecticu­t's — 19 percent. While state-issued debt in Connecticu­t is equivalent to 15 percent of personal income, Texas's state-level debt totals just 4 percent. By contrast, debt issued by Texas counties, cities and other municipali­ties totals 15 percent of personal income, while Connecticu­t municipal debt equates to just 4 percent. Hence, the supposedly “drowning in debt” Connecticu­t maintains a debt-to-personal-income ratio that is identical with supposedly “low-tax” Texas.

And far from spiraling out of control, as a number of conservati­ve commentato­rs claim, according to OPM's Fiscal Accountabi­lity Report published last November, Connecticu­t has reduced its bond issuances steadily since 2015, under Democratic governors Dan Malloy and Ned Lamont. Indeed, Connecticu­t's 2021 issuance of general obligation bonds was just 43 percent of the amount issued in 2015. That reduction in debt issuance at the state level is reflected in the fact that the state is set to retire fully 70 percent of its general obligation debt within the next decade, and 93 percent within the next 15 years. The state's debt service, at just under 12 percent of the operating budget, has remained stable for several years, and is projected to remain flat for the next several.

So, far from drowning in debt, Connecticu­t's debt to personal income, though somewhat higher than average, is by no means at disastrous levels. Indeed, we rank similarly to other major states, debt service remains stable relative to the budget, and state-level debt issuance has been reduced steadily for several years. Clearly, that's one of the reasons that all four major debt rating agencies upgraded Connecticu­t's ratings recently to levels signifying strong investment-grade debt.

Issued debt is just one of the four components of Connecticu­t's liabilitie­s, but an important one. And on that metric, the state is doing well.

The supposedly “drowning in debt” Connecticu­t maintains a debt-to-personal-income ratio that is identical with supposedly “low-tax” Texas.

 ?? Associated Press ?? Then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, right, talks with Connecticu­t's governor-elect Ned Lamont at the governor's residence in 2018.
Associated Press Then-Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, right, talks with Connecticu­t's governor-elect Ned Lamont at the governor's residence in 2018.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States