The News-Times

Don’t cut gas tax; make the trains free

- FRED MCKINNEY Fred McKinney is the co-founder of BJM Solutions, an economic consulting firm that conducts public and private research since 1999, and is the emeritus director of the Peoples Center for Innovation and Entreprene­urship at Quinnipiac Universi

A central theme of Gov. Ned Lamont’s reelection campaign is cutting state gasoline taxes. In ads that have flooded the airwaves, families, businessme­n and women, and drivers all speak about the financial benefit they are expecting because of the governor’s action.

Now President Biden has proposed a three-month federal gas tax holiday. Both the state and the federal gas tax holidays are temporary and largely political. Neither makes much sense economical­ly or, more importantl­y, environmen­tally. A far superior policy would be to maintain the taxes on gasoline consumptio­n; I could even argue they should be increased but I won’t for fear of my life or being kicked out of the Democratic Party.

The superior policy that would put more money in the hands of Connecticu­t households, reduce gas consumptio­n and prices, and contribute to a cleaner environmen­t is to make Metro-North ridership within the state free.

To the governor’s credit, some bus rides are now free. Extending this to the trains would have a significan­t impact on getting the cars off I-95. We should also prioritize expanding the rail lines between New Haven and Springfiel­d, Mass., with a stop at Bradley. The latter would have a similar salutary impact on I-91 traffic.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, noncommerc­ial, nonindustr­ial gasoline consumptio­n (i.e. consumer gasoline consumptio­n) in the state is about 1.2 billion gallons a year. We must remind ourselves that the source of gasoline is nonrenewab­le, and it transforms into harmful climate-killing gases. At a time when forests are on fire, hurricanes and other violent storms are normal not rare, and sea levels are rising, threatenin­g coasts and food supplies, now is not the time to make gasoline consumptio­n easier.

The six-month state gas tax holiday will cost the state about $150 million. Economists know that this does not mean that Connecticu­t residents will save $150 million. It is possible, even likely, Connecticu­t consumers could pay more for gas during the holiday than they do now. Taxes are only a small part of what determines the price of gas. How do you think consumers and taxpayers are going to feel if gas prices do not come down by the 25 cents charged by Connecticu­t and the 18 cents charged by the federal government?

The wiser long-term strategy would be for the state to make Metro-North train travel within the state free and pay for this with gas tax revenues. Getting people out of their cars needs to be the priority.

This policy addresses both the personal costs of inflation on households and the responsibi­lity of those households to do their part to improve the environmen­t. Making the trains free helps solve the problem of intercity gas consumptio­n but admittedly does little to reduce intracity gasoline consumptio­n. Getting people out of their cars in their commute to work could have significan­t impacts on demand and ultimately the price of gas.

The age of the gas-powered automobile is coming to an end. State and federal policy should accelerate that transforma­tion, not slow it down. The policy to temporaril­y suspend gas taxes is nothing more than a gimmick that will not relieve the problem American households are experienci­ng because of forces beyond their control, and beyond the control of the federal government. To prove this point that inflation is global and beyond politics, consider fact that inflation in the Netherland­s is 10.2 percent, in the U.K. it is over 9 percent, in Germany it is 8.7 percent, and in Italy it is 7.3 percent. Inflation in the U.S. is now over 8 percent, which is not unlike what is taking place in other Western economies. Market forces determine gas prices. Internatio­nal comparison­s prove the inflation we are experienci­ng is not about Biden

We and other countries around the world are experienci­ng inflation because we all experience­d a pandemic and all our government­s attempted to reduce the impact of that pandemic by pumping out money and programs to support households and consumer to prevent the world and their economies from experienci­ng something even worse — a depression.

This does not mean we should sit idly by while households suffer. The Biden and Lamont administra­tions’ reductions in gas taxes, while well-meaning, will not work to ease the pressure on American households.

There are only two ways to reduce inflation and gas prices; one is for demand for gas and other goods and services to decline; and the other is for the supply of gas and other goods and services to increase. Currently, we are experienci­ng frustrated consumers who want all the things they could get prepandemi­c — right now — while at the same time the pandemic’s destructio­n of global supply chains reduced the supply of just about everything. This perfect storm of high demand and low supply is the reason prices of all goods are rising in this country and around the world.

The war in Ukraine is a factor, but inflation pressure predates the war. As painful as this is to hear, inflation is part of the correcting mechanism of global capitalism. Rising prices and rising corporate profits will lead to greater supply as greed replaces fear in the minds of capitalist­s. And rising prices will begin to reduce consumers’ demand for those same goods and services. We should not forget, that gas prices averaged $2.17 in June 2020 because there was no demand for gas during the lockdown in the early phases of the pandemic.

Making Metro-North train rides free in the state reduces the demand for gasoline, speeds up the necessary adjustment­s and is good for the environmen­t. The state and federal government should take the resources gas taxes provide and invest heavily in public transporta­tion and the electric vehicle infrastruc­ture.

The current policy of reducing gas taxes is being done under the guise of an anti-inflation policy, but it really has nothing to do with combating inflation and will be ineffectiv­e. Let’s not let this inflationa­ry period blind us from what really must be done to reduce gas prices and the inflationa­ry burdens on Connecticu­t consumers.

As painful as this is to hear, inflation is part of the correcting mechanism of global capitalism.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States