The Nome Nugget

State sanitation spending in AHFC bond proceeds bill

- By Megan Alvanna-Stimpfle

The coronaviru­s pandemic shed light on the critical need for access to water and sewer. Understand­ing a pathway to service for Alaska’s 30 unserved communitie­s demands navigating a complex web of agency regulation­s that leave unserved communitie­s ineligible for funding.

Each fiscal year, between $80 million and $120 million are appropriat­ed by the federal and state government to help tackle a $1.4 billion sanitation infrastruc­ture need in Alaska. The State of Alaska provides a 25 percent match for federal Alaska Native village sanitation funds the Alaska Delegation secures in the United State Department of Agricultur­e, and Environmen­tal Protection Agencies appropriat­ions bills.

In his fiscal year 2022 budget, Governor Mike Dunleavy transmitte­d to lawmakers on February 16 a bill (HB 74) to fund the state match for federal sanitation funds via AHFC bond proceeds. The bill authorizes AHFC to issue bonds for village safe water projects generally funded in the capital budget. The budget request adds $4,545,200 for a new request of $42,487,200 for first time service projects.

“The match for village safe water this year is in the budget as Alaska Housing Finance Corporatio­n Bond proceeds and there is a bill for that that is also moving through the legislatur­e at this time” said Ruth Kostic, Administra­tive Services Director for Governor Dunleavey during a March 3 Senate Finance Committee hearing. The budget request for fiscal year 2022 is for $18 million, a 25 percent match to $52 million in federal funds appropriat­ed by Congress in December of 2020.

In the “FY22 capital budget request, this is the governor’s amended numbers, which are an increase of $2.3 million match over what was requested in the original budget. That increase is a result of the federal funding that passed in late December, specifical­ly from EPA, with an increase of $7 million what we had previously received in fiscal year 21” said Kostic.

Understand­ing the cycle of the federal fiscal year and the budget and appropriat­ion process sheds light on how the Governor works with the Alaska Legislatur­e to secure matching state funds. Sanitation funds for Alaska Native villages are appropriat­ed by the United States Congress with the passage of USDA, IHS and EPA appropriat­ions bills. Senator Murkowski (R-AK) serves as the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Appropriat­ions Subcommitt­ee on Interior, Environmen­t and Related Agencies, appropriat­ing IHS and EPA sanitation funds.

As the agencies administer the programs, regulation­s establishe­d by the agencies often determine whether or not a community will get served. The state of Alaska administer­s the Best Practice Score to determine whether or not a community is eligible for federal —USDA or EPA — state sanitation funds managed by the Village Safe Water program’s Capital Improvemen­t Project process. On December 9, 2020 the Alaska Native Health Board passed a resolution recommendi­ng the state of Alaska “discontinu­e best practice score thresholds for underserve­d and unserved communitie­s applying for Capital Improvemen­t Projects” and further urges the state to “release constructi­on funding to underserve­d/unserved communitie­s with an approved MOA in place.”

Hurdles

Accessing EPA funding requires a certified operator, a challenge in the absence of statewide, culturally relevant operator training.

The high costs of constructi­on limits the eligibilit­y of communitie­s for IHS funds. IHS funding is limited by cost caps. To connect homes to first time service it costs $350$750,000 per home, said Carrie Bohan, Facilities Services Program Manager for the state of Alaska during the March 3 Senate Finance Hearing. But according to the 2019 IHS Sanitation Deficiency System Manual the cost cap for the northern region is $235,500, $169,000 for the southern region and $197,000 for the central and western regions of Alaska. IHS cost caps and a local match requiremen­t often render unserved communitie­s ineligible and prevent unserved communitie­s from receiving aid.

Village Safe Water projects typically last 5-10 years to completion depending on size and complexity of the project, availabili­ty of funds and the ability of community to meet ongoing constructi­on funding conditions, said Bohan. In order for engineers to cut costs they must plan and execute projects operating within the timelines of Alaska’s short summer constructi­on window, a reality the regulatory process for funds often ignores. “You’ve got to get materials ordered before the spring barge leaves Seattle or Anchorage by May that means you’ve got have any manufactur­ed components of systems ordered well in advance to be ready for spring shipping,” said Mike Kruse, project manager acting as the owner’s representa­tive for the Norton Sound Health Corporatio­n via a private project management firm, Arcadus.

Hope on the horizon

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 provides several provisions to help address sanitation: $500 million for the Secretary of Health and Human Services for States and Indian Tribes to provide funds to owners of public water systems to reduce water rates for low income households, $10 million for the Indian Health Service for potable water, $20 million to the Bureau of Indian Affairs for potable water and $20 billion for tribal government­s from the Department of Treasury for water and sewer, broadband and pandemic impacted sectors, like tourism and the hospitalit­y sector.

On March 24 the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs holds an oversight hearing “Build Back Better: Water Infrastruc­ture Needs for Native Communitie­s.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States