The Norwalk Hour

Gun-maker Ruger’s shareholde­rs vote for ‘human rights’ study

- By Alexander Soule Alex.Soule@scni.com; 203-842-2545; @casoulman

A majority of shareholde­rs of Sturm Ruger voted for the company to hire an outside consultant to study the “human rights” impact of the guns it sells — but with the manufactur­er giving no immediate indication whether it will comply with the vote nonbinding.

Ruger shares did not move significan­tly following the Wednesday vote, trading Friday at just below $70. Ruger stock hit an all-time high of $87.55 in August 2020, as gun sales surged that summer amid protests nationally after the death of George Floyd while being arrested in Minneapoli­s.

Activists have rallied in the past few weeks for more effective gun control measures, after last month’s school massacre in Uvalde, Texas. The assailant had bought military-style rifles from a Georgia-based manufactur­er called Daniel Defense, which has pledged to cooperate with investigat­ors.

U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy and Richard Blumenthal, both DConn., have been vocal proponents for gun control, with Blumenthal signaling plans to attend a demonstrat­ion in Newtown Friday evening to mark National Gun Violence Awareness Day.

Ruger has its headquarte­rs in Fairfield as one of the two largest gun makers selling to the mass retail market, along with Smith & Wesson. Ruger has factories in New Hampshire, North Carolina and Arizona, with a workforce totaling about 1,900 people.

In a filing with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, Ruger’s board of directors had countered that it viewed the measure as an “affront” to the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constituti­on guaranteei­ng the right to bear arms, and that it could threaten the financial viability of Ruger.

Asked by an unnamed shareholde­r during the annual meeting of steps Ruger is taking to help the nation reduce the proliferat­ion of guns, CEO Chris Killoy referred to a 2019 corporate document that he said offers “widerangin­g”

ideas. He said the company will consider additional steps, without making any commitment to a human-rights impact assessment or other possibilit­ies.

“We monitor the acquisitio­n and ownership and seek to ensure that not only the products we make are safe, but that we do everything we possibly can to ensure that our owners take their responsibi­lity as firearms owners seriously,” Killoy said Wednesday. “We have a series of warnings throughout the instructio­n manual and on our website.”

The board of directors had advised shareholde­rs to reject the measure. Chairman Ron Whitaker is a onetime CEO of Hartfordba­sed Colt Industries, and based today in Savannah, Ga. as a corporate turnaround specialist. Other Ruger directors include Killoy and his predecesso­r Mike

Fifer; Sandra Froman, the former president of the National Rifle Associatio­n; and retired U.S. Army Brig. Gen. Becky Halstead.

Halstead has a footnote in history as the first woman graduate from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point to make the rank of general, going on to lead the Army Ordnance Center which oversees the procuremen­t of weapons and ammunition.

The Interfaith Center for Corporate Responsibi­lity and member CommonSpir­it Health had pressed for the shareholde­r vote. Ruger had previously responded to shareholde­r pressure with the 2019 human-rights policy statement that articulate­s goals for safer ownership of guns, but does not include data and related outcomes of its current policies.

“This assessment will provide vital informatio­n that ultimately will safeguard long-term shareholde­r

value,” said Laura Krausa, director of advocacy programs for CommonSpir­it Health, speaking briefly Wednesday at the annual meeting during a window the company allotted for comments and questions. “Ruger first needs to understand where it’s greatest human rights risks lie.”

ICCR and activists nationally point to the ongoing epidemic of mass shootings as justifying farmore stringent curbs on gun sales and ownership. Possible solutions include barring sales to people under age 21, which would likely spark court challenges; expanding background checks and funding for mental health; and exposing people to criminal liability for crimes committed by others with the guns they own, if they do not keep them locked in safes.

 ?? Jon Shapley / Houston Chronicle ?? Ruger handguns on a display rack in August 2021 at a Houston store. On Wednesday, shareholde­rs voted for the company to hire an outside firm to undertake a “human rights impact” study of the impact of its guns and policies on communitie­s. The company indicated it will consider the request, which is nonbinding, after the board advised shareholde­rs to reject the proposal.
Jon Shapley / Houston Chronicle Ruger handguns on a display rack in August 2021 at a Houston store. On Wednesday, shareholde­rs voted for the company to hire an outside firm to undertake a “human rights impact” study of the impact of its guns and policies on communitie­s. The company indicated it will consider the request, which is nonbinding, after the board advised shareholde­rs to reject the proposal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States