The Norwalk Hour

Conn. needs a whole new delegation

- By Red Jahncke Red Jahncke is president of the Townsend Group, a management consulting firm in Greenwich.

What if Connecticu­t’s All-Democrat Congressio­nal delegation had had their way a year ago? The Magnificen­t Seven all supported President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better proposal, a constellat­ion of new federal spending initiative­s that would have cost anywhere from $2 trillion to $6 trillion.

At the time, the national debt had already skyrockete­d by almost $7 trillion largely to fund spending over the course of the shutdown and the pandemic.

Imagine inflation today if that massive boondoggle had been enacted.

If ever there were a reason to “nationaliz­e” an election and for voters to “throw out the bums” for misdeeds in Washington, promoting such wildly irresponsi­ble national spending should be the textbook example.

Voters in Connecticu­t should throw out Sen. Richard Blumenthal and Representa­tives Joe Courtney, Rosa DeLauro, Johanna Hayes, Jim Himes and John Larson for fiscal and financial malpractic­e. They will have to wait two years to toss Sen. Chris Murphy.

It was not just the proposed Build Back blowout. These fiscal know-nothings voted for the $2 trillion American Rescue Plan (ARP), which critics at the time said would fuel inflation — and it surely has.

The $2.6 billion of ARP money sent to Connecticu­t only served to slow the state’s slow-motion fiscal disaster, which is likely soon to speed up again.

Naturally, the Magnificen­t Seven will claim to have “brought home the bacon.”

Not so much. Almost exactly $2.6 billion wound up in the state’s two big public pension funds for the state’s well-paid unionized state employees and teachers. It doesn’t take a financial genius to see that regular citizens saw not a dime of ARP money.

Now, raging inflation is forcing the Federal Reserve Bank to increase interest rates sharply, with only negative consequenc­es for Connecticu­t. The stock market has plummeted. Connecticu­t is one of the states most dependent upon taxes on stock market income.

Interest rates are rising rapidly. Government­s at all levels face sharply higher interest expense. As one of the most heavily indebted states in the nation, Connecticu­t will see one of the largest increases in interest expense.

Yet, the federal largesse has addled the brains of Gov.Ned Lamont and state Democrats. Tucked away in the 700 pages of the Democrats’ budget adopted in May are the following words about the governor’s and the Democrat’s position on the state’s debt service: “Governor: Reduce general debt service by $22.9 million in FY 23 to reflect improved market rates ... Committee (of the General Assembly): Same as governor.”

Really? In May, the governor and his fellow travelers thought market rates were improving?

There’s more. Earlier this month, the governor announced a new $875 million Community Investment Fund to be funded with more state borrowing.

Really? However well-intentione­d or sorely needed the community investment­s may be, now is not the right time for the state to borrow even more money. What happened to Lamont’s fabled “debt diet?”

The nut of it is the mentality involved. The Magnificen­t Seven have indulged fiscal fairy tales in Washington and have brought the fantasies home to Connecticu­t. Unfortunat­ely, both the fairy tales and the fantasies have real consequenc­es, which neither the nation nor the state can afford.

Likely, the Magnificen­t Seven can maintain their fiscal illusions because the federal government can print money, which it has done in profligate fashion. So profligate that the nation may be approachin­g that point at which the “unsustaina­ble” can no longer be sustained.

The state does not have a printing press. It cannot afford the fiscal-fantasy mentality that the Magnificen­t Seven indulge in, and bring home from, Washington. They don’t bring home bacon, but rather a mentality of fiscal recklessne­ss that the state can no longer afford, if ever it could. Connecticu­t needs a whole new Congressio­nal delegation.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States