The Oklahoman

Court approves turnpike bonds

- BY RANDY ELLIS Staff Writer rellis@oklahoman.com

The Oklahoma Supreme Court on Tuesday unanimousl­y approved the issuance of $480 million in Oklahoma turnpike bonds, clearing the way for the first phase of multiple turnpike improvemen­t and expansion projects that will be accompanie­d by systemwide toll increases.

The bond sale is likely to occur in mid-January and 12 percent toll increases will be implemente­d Feb. 1, said Jack Damrill, spokesman for the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority.

The initial 12 percent toll hike will increase the cost of driving a passenger car from Oklahoma City to Tulsa on the Turner Turnpike by 50 cents — rising to $4.40 for Pikepass customers and $4.50 for cash customers.

Costs will rise proportion­ately for other types of vehicles and motorists on other Oklahoma turnpikes.

The initial toll increase will be followed by a 2.5 percent increase Jan. 1, 2018, and an additional 2.5 increase on July 1, 2019, officials said.

The increased toll revenues will be used to help pay for three bond issues that will finance constructi­on of the Driving Forward initiative announced by the governor and turnpike officials in October 2015.

That initiative — projected to cost about $900 million — will involve work on the following six turnpike constructi­on projects:

• A new, 21-mile eastern Oklahoma County toll road to link Interstate 40 with the Turner Turnpike.

• A seven-mile extension of the Kilpatrick Turnpike in southwest Oklahoma City that will go from where the Kilpatrick Turnpike currently ends at I-40 in western Oklahoma County to link up with State Highway 152/Airport Road.

• A Turner Turnpike reconstruc­tion and widening project that will focus on widening and improving lighting on a 22-mile stretch of the existing Turner Turnpike between Bristow and the west end of the Creek Turnpike near Tulsa.

• An H.E. Bailey Turnpike reconstruc­tion project that will involve widening and improving 7.5 miles of that turnpike between Bridge Creek and North Meridian Avenue.

• The Gilcrease Expressway project which will complete the western loop around Tulsa by constructi­ng 2.5 miles of new turnpike to connect L.L. Tisdale with Interstate 44.

• The Muskogee Turnpike reconstruc­tion project which will involve reconstruc­ting 9.5 miles of the Muskogee Turnpike between the Creek Turnpike interchang­e and State Highway 51 near Coweta.

The $480 million bond issue validated by the state Supreme Court will provide funds to move the projects forward and will be followed by two other bond issues needed to complete the projects, Damrill said.

The second round of bonds likely will be issued in the fall and the third likely after Jan. 1, 2018, he said. The amounts of those bond issues have not yet been determined, he added.

Damrill said constructi­on work already is taking place on the Muskogee and H.E. Bailey turnpikes and dirt should be turned on the Turner Turnpike sometime around April or May.

Land acquisitio­ns for the Oklahoma County projects were largely suspended while the Supreme Court case was pending, but Damrill said he expects activity to pick up fairly rapidly now that the case has been decided.

The eastern Oklahoma County project has been particular­ly controvers­ial, drawing protests from many area homeowners.

The protests and court challenge have delayed the projects some. Turnpike officials now hope to have all the projects completed by late 2020 or 2021, Damrill said.

Also Tuesday, the Oklahoma Supreme Court rejected a challenge to the constituti­onality of the initial bond issue by Oklahoma City attorney Jerry Fent, who contended that by including authorizat­ion for multiple turnpike projects in the enabling statute, the Legislatur­e had violated a prohibitio­n against logrolling.

Logrolling is the practice of including more than one subject in the same piece of legislatio­n. It is banned on the premise that it promotes bad legislatio­n by enabling lawmakers to pair unpopular or financiall­y unfeasible measures with popular ones to get them approved.

The state Supreme Court rejected that argument in this case, stating “the projects to be funded are not unrelated and, in fact, all concern the constructi­on and maintenanc­e of turnpikes.”

Fent also argued that repeatedly re-funding older turnpike bond issues so that their revenues can be used to help fund constructi­on of new turnpikes creates a situation where debt could go on forever and violates a state constituti­onal prohibitio­n against “perpetuiti­es.”

The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority “will cause the people of Oklahoma ... to never be free of debt,” Fent argued in a legal brief.

The state Supreme Court ruled the bond issue satisfied that requiremen­t because it had a stated, expected maturity date of Jan. 1, 2046.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States