The Oklahoman

Intel: Putin ordered influence campaign

Trump: Hack had no impact on election results

- BY EILEEN SULLIVAN, DEB RIECHMANN AND JONATHAN LEMIRE

WASHINGTON — Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a hidden campaign to influence America’s presidenti­al election in favor of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, U.S. intelligen­ce agencies declared Friday in the government’s first formal allegation in support of sensationa­l claims that Trump and his supporters have staunchly resisted.

The intelligen­ce report, an unclassifi­ed version of a more-detailed classified account given earlier to Trump, the White House and congressio­nal leaders, withheld any evidence to back up its assertions. The president-elect said after his own meeting with the nation’s top intelligen­ce officials that it was clear Russian email hacking did not deliver him the presidency.

There was no suggestion that Russia affected actual vote counting or tampered with ballot machines, said the unclassifi­ed version, which was the most explicit account to date of Russian efforts to interfere with the U.S. political process. But the report said Russia’s actions included hacking into the email accounts of the Democratic National Committee and individual Democrats including Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, and using state-funded propaganda and paid “trolls” to make nasty comments on social media services.

The unclassifi­ed version included footnotes acknowledg­ing that it “does not include the full supporting informatio­n on key elements of the influence campaign.” But it said its conclusion­s were identical to the classified version, which was more detailed.

The report said the Russian effort was both political and personal.

“Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton and harm her electabili­ty and potential presidency,” it said. “We further assess Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.”

Putin most likely wanted to discredit Clinton because he blames her for inciting mass protests against his regime in late 2011 and early 2012, and because he resents her for disparagin­g comments she has made about him, the report said. It said the Russian effort was the “boldest yet” intended to affect a U.S. election.

As Trump met in New York with intelligen­ce officials for his briefing about Russia’s campaign, Congress tallied the Electoral College votes, officially confirming Trump’s November victory.

Trump has been dismissive of the intelligen­ce agencies’ claims of Russia’s involvemen­t for months, long before he saw the classified informatio­n Friday. After finally seeing the intelligen­ce behind the claims of the outgoing Obama administra­tion, he released a one-page statement that did not address whether Russia sought to meddle. Instead, he said, “there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election.”

The top U.S. intelligen­ce official told Congress Thursday that intelligen­ce agencies had no way of gauging what influence this meddling had on the outcome of the election. It was unclear Friday what evidence Trump had to support his claims.

According to the public report, when it appeared that Clinton might well win the election Putin turned his focus to underminin­g her presidency.

Trump acknowledg­ed in his statement that “Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people” are consistent­ly trying to hack U.S. networks, including the Democratic National Committee’s.

He said, as did the intelligen­ce report, that “there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines.”

Trump said that as president he would appoint a team to develop a plan to “aggressive­ly combat and stop cyberattac­ks.”

Before seeing the classified intelligen­ce report Friday, Trump dismissed the assessment of interferen­ce and told The New York Times the focus on Russia’s involvemen­t is a “political witch hunt” by adversarie­s who are embarrasse­d they lost the election. “They got beaten very badly in the election,” Trump said. “They are very embarrasse­d about it. To some extent, it’s a witch hunt. They just focus on this.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States