The Oklahoman

‘Dressed for the Image’

AT NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY, MARLENE DIETRICH EXERTS A SEDUCTIVE, ENIGMATIC PULL

- BY ANN HORNADAY The Washington Post

Cinema is a medium of moving images, of carefully framed compositio­ns and dynamic, bravura gestures. But, more than all that, it’s a medium of faces.

For proof, look no further than “Marlene Dietrich: Dressed for the Image,” on view at the National Portrait Gallery through next spring. A collection of dozens of rare and familiar photos of the iconic movie star, as well as snippets of films and written correspond­ence, the exhibition plums Dietrich’s power, both as a screen object and a social-change agent: Here was a leggy, supremely feminine muse who made menswear stylish decades before “Annie Hall” and who embraced androgyny long before Bowie and Jagger.

Dietrich’s forwardloo­king aesthetic is on full display in “Dressed for the Image,” which takes its title from an interview in which the actress was quoted as saying: “I dress for the image. Not for myself, not for the public, not for fashion, not for men.” Indeed, this show offers something of a primer in how stardom is crafted and confected, as mere mortals are transforme­d by makeup, costuming and clever tricks of the light into gods who seem lit from within.

An early photograph of Dietrich as a teenager in Germany offers a baseline for understand­ing how far such self-invention can go. In this formal portrait, taken in 1918, Dietrich — born Marie Magdalene Dietrich — is nothing if not proper, her hair taken up in a huge bow, her frock trimmed with lace at the collar and sleeves.

Dietrich would plunge herself into the freewheeli­ng ether of Weimar-era cabaret culture in the 1920s, when she began to experiment with the cross-dressing, sexually ambiguous aesthetic that would become her hallmark. It took Dietrich’s collaborat­ion with director Josef von Sternberg — beginning in 1930 with “The Blue Angel” and continuing over six more films — to elaborate on that nascent persona, with von Sternberg and the star-making artisans of Paramount Pictures shaping her into the ethereal, enigmatic and teasingly erotic screen presence we think of when we hear the name Marlene Dietrich today.

That image is encapsulat­ed in a publicity still for the film “Morocco,” in which Dietrich wore a men’s tuxedo to play a French nightclub singer named Amy Jolly. In Eugene Robert Richee’s photograph, Dietrich beholds the camera while lighting a cigarette, half of her face in shadow (Sternberg lit her from the top, to create a halo effect, and from the side, to hide an imperfect nose), the light dancing off a jaunty top hat whose finish is as velvety as Dietrich’s own skin and hair. In another picture, of Dietrich relaxing at small party thrown by Paramount founder Jesse Lasky, even the most nominally casual moment feels styled to within an inch of its life.

Whether choreograp­hed or candid, these images of Dietrich exemplify the power she exerted as a creature of the cinema, someone for whom the unique alchemy of light, lenses and photochemi­cal film awakened otherwise latent expressive properties. Alluring but also withholdin­g; sultry but playful; enigmatic but unnervingl­y direct — these are the contradict­ions that made Dietrich the biggest star of her era during the Paramount years, her frankly latitudina­l sexual orientatio­ns notwithsta­nding.

If it’s easy to credit Sternberg and the actress’ own performati­ve bent with creating the “Dietrich persona,” it may not be entirely accurate. Even while appreciati­ng the careful framing, meticulous grooming and self-consciousl­y subversive wardrobe, it’s possible to see glimmers of the girl in that 1918 portrait,

staring at the camera with unforced, disarming candor. Because underneath the artifice was always an abiding honesty, whether Dietrich was dressing the way she wanted to, taking the lovers she wanted or taking a political stand at great personal, and potentiall­y profession­al, cost.

Perhaps the most affecting photo in “Dressed for the Image” isn’t an elegant silver gelatin by way of George Hurrell or Irving Penn. Rather, it’s a passport-size, standard-issue snapshot of Dietrich attached to the 1937 document she filled out when applying to immigrate to the United States (she later renounced her German citizenshi­p). Dietrich, who refused to star in a Nazi propaganda film and considered Hitler “an idiot,” is shown here at her bravest and most fiercely uncompromi­sing. And there’s nary a top hat or key light in sight.

 ?? [PHOTO BY GEORGE HURRELL/PROVIDED BY MICHAEL HADLEY EPSTEIN AND SCOTT EDWARD SCHWIMER] ?? Marlene Dietrich is pictured in 1937.
[PHOTO BY GEORGE HURRELL/PROVIDED BY MICHAEL HADLEY EPSTEIN AND SCOTT EDWARD SCHWIMER] Marlene Dietrich is pictured in 1937.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States