The Oklahoman

Trump can’t control GOP’s base

- Jonah Goldberg JonahsColu­mn@aol.com

The conservati­ve movement is caught in a Catch-22 of its own making. In the war against “the establishm­ent” we have made being an outsider the most important qualificat­ion for a politician. The problem? Once elected, outsiders by definition become insiders. This isn’t just a semantic point. The Constituti­on requires politician­s to work through the system if they’re going to get anything done.

Look at all the senators who rode the tea party wave into power:

Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Ron Johnson, Pat Toomey, Mike Lee. To one extent or another, they are now seen as swamp things, not swamp drainers, by the pitchfork populists.

For example, Rubio was hailed by The New York Times as “The First Senator from the Tea Party.” But once he became a senator, he became … a senator.

There’s nothing wrong with that. It’s his job. And obviously, policy choices matter. Rubio embraced immigratio­n reform and it killed him with the talk-radio crowd. But there’s a larger dynamic at work. It’s like taking the job seriously is an automatic disqualifi­cation for the perpetuall­y furious. Merely talking like a halfway responsibl­e politician is proof of selling out.

Cruz’s case is also instructiv­e. Over the last decade, no politician more deftly hitched his political wagon to populist passions. He wore the animosity of his colleagues like a badge of honor. He had only one problem: He talked like a creature of the establishm­ent — largely because the career politician was one. He knew the lyrics to every populist fight song, but he couldn’t carry the tune.

Until recently there was an “outsider” glass ceiling. The most strident populists — Ron Paul, Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann — could not get through the presidenti­al primaries because the math wasn’t on their side. At least half of the GOP doesn’t want fire-breathers, so the winning candidate had to get a large slice of the traditiona­l Republican vote and combine it with other constituen­cies. That’s how Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, the Bushes, John McCain and Mitt Romney did it.

But Donald Trump not only jumped into the fray at the height of populist fervor, the field was also divided 17 ways. No one spoke less like a politician. No one who understood how governing works would have promised the things Trump promised because they’d either know or care that such things are impossible.

President Trump has learned this simple fact the hard way. Yet for the first eight months of his presidency, his core supporters have stuck with him. The establishm­ent remains the villain and Trump the hero for his willingnes­s to say or tweet things that make all the right people angry. For his most ardent supporters, the fault for his legislativ­e failures lies entirely with the swamp, the establishm­ent or the “Deep State.”

But Judge Roy Moore’s victory in a runoff against Alabama Sen. Luther Strange may signal that the base is not Trump’s army to command. Trump endorsed Strange, and that endorsemen­t didn’t help at all. The most important factor was Moore’s demonizati­on of the establishm­ent.

What’s both funny and sad is that there is remarkably little intellectu­al or ideologica­l substance to the current populist fever. Strange was more conservati­ve than Moore but less bombastic. Moore opposed Obamacare repeal and, until recently, couldn’t say what DACA was. In other words, MAGA populism is less of an agenda and more of a mood.

A lot of people are simply mad as hell and don’t want to take it anymore. Republican politician­s can’t ignore the anger. Ideally they’d channel it toward productive ends, as they did in the past. But further stoking the anger for political gain is not just ill-advised, it’s pointless, because eventually politician­s have to govern.

Note: Charles Krauthamme­r is away.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States