The Oklahoman

Writer was wrong

-

Steven Lynch’s claim (Your Views, Oct. 7) that investigat­ions have found climate researcher­s intentiona­lly manipulate­d temperatur­e data to misreprese­nt atmospheri­c warming is false. Some scientists were adjusting metropolit­an heat island data to statistica­lly correlate with rural localities. It was discovered that difference­s in metropolit­an heat island measuremen­ts were insignific­ant compared with rural measuremen­ts, not requiring an adjustment. This is science doing what it’s supposed to do and it still unequivoca­lly supports climate change.

Invoking Steven Goddard to support your claims isn’t a good strategy. While not citing an article, maybe Lynch was referring to Goddard’s 2008 article in the online Register, claiming arctic ice was not melting in spite of NASA and NOAA evidence to the contrary. He cited a University of Illinois study to show the National Snow and Ice Distributi­on Center in Boulder, Colorado, as invalid. The University of Illinois contacted the Register to dispute Goddard’s methodolog­y and claims. A researcher at University of Illinois said, regarding Goddard, “Such an approach is simply not valid.” Goddard had to issue a public retraction.

David Grow, Edmond

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States