The Oklahoman

Immigrant teen has abortion after win in court

- BY JESSICA GRESKO AND NOMAAN MERCHANT

WASHINGTON — An immigrant teen in federal custody who was seeking an abortion over the Trump administra­tion’s objections had the procedure Wednesday after a U.S. appeals court ruled in her favor, her lawyers said.

The 17-year-old had fought for a month to have an abortion, eventually leading to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The agency oversees facilities for unaccompan­ied minors who enter the United States illegally and had refused her requests for an abortion.

The full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Tuesday restored a lower court’s ruling against HHS. The new ruling ordered HHS to step aside and allow the teen to go forward with an abortion.

The Trump administra­tion did not appeal to the Supreme Court before the procedure, but advocates for the teen — referred to in court filings as Jane Doe to shield her identity — rushed to arrange the abortion after the ruling Tuesday afternoon.

“I’m relieved for Jane Doe, but I’m so incredibly frustrated that we had to go through all of this for what is a very well-settled constituti­onal right,” Brigitte Amiri, an ACLU lawyer who argued for the teen in court, told The Associated Press.

In a statement released by the ACLU, the teen said she “came to this country to make a better life” for herself, and found out she was pregnant after entering immigratio­n custody.

“I knew immediatel­y what was best for me then, as I do now — that I’m not ready to be a parent,” the teen said.

The teen illegally entered the U.S. in September and was taken to an HHS facility for unaccompan­ied minors in South Texas. She obtained a state court order on Sept. 25 permitting an abortion. But federal officials refused to transport her or temporaril­y release her so that others could take her for the procedure.

HHS argued it had establishe­d a policy of “refusing to facilitate” abortions for people in its care. Government lawyers said the teen could ask to be returned to her country of origin instead of seeking an abortion while in HHS’ custody. Lawyers for the teen said government officials were illegally denying medical care to which the teen was entitled, and that the shelter had instead taken her to a crisis pregnancy center. Such centers try to discourage pregnant women from having abortions.

In emails released by the ACLU, Scott Lloyd, the head of HHS’ Office of Refugee Resettleme­nt, which oversees facilities for unaccompan­ied minors, is quoted telling a subordinat­e in March that its facilities “should not be supporting abortion services pre or post-release.” Lloyd is quoted in other emails asking about the specific case of another pregnant teenager and offering to find a “few good families” to “see her through her pregnancy.”

The teen’s case “is a canary in the coal mine,” Amiri said. “It is emblematic of what is to come.”

Jane’s Due Process, a Texas group that works with minors seeking abortions, said it and other groups had raised private money to pay for the teen’s abortion. It said lawyers appointed to represent the teen’s interests would take her from the South Texas facility where she was being held to and from an abortion clinic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States