The Oklahoman

Evangelica­ls and Trump

- Michael Gerson michaelger­son@washpost.com

Billy Graham has been one of the most visible, respected and influentia­l Christians in the world since the 1950s. But he often had a blind spot when it came to politics. Graham was Richard Nixon’s golfing buddy and spiritual adviser. Nixon consulted him on everything from his vice presidenti­al pick to the conduct of the Vietnam War.

In Graham’s view, Nixon was “a modest and moral man with spiritual sensitivit­y.”

He “held such noble standards of ethics and morality for the nation.”

Graham was in denial about Watergate until the last. When he finally read through the

Watergate tape transcript­s — including profanity, political corruption, lying, racism and sexism — Graham remembers becoming physically ill. He said later of Nixon: “I wonder whether I might have exaggerate­d his spirituali­ty in my own mind.” Graham’s biographer William Martin quotes a close Graham associate who is more blunt: “For the life of me, I honestly believe that after all these years, Billy still has no idea of how badly Nixon snookered him.”

We can now look back on such gullibilit­y with nostalgia. Billy Graham had the alibi of selfdecept­ion. But Franklin Graham, Jerry Falwell Jr., Robert Jeffress and Donald Trump’s other evangelica­l advocates have no such excuse. They have made their political bargain with open eyes.

Trump has made profanity an unavoidabl­e part of our political culture. He is in the midst of a gathering corruption scandal that has left close aides under indictment. He tells repeated and obvious lies. He incites ethnic and racial resentment as a political strategy and was caught on tape bragging about sexual assault. Add to this something that could never be said of Nixon: The credible accusation that Trump paid hush money to a porn star to cover up an affair.

And what is Franklin Graham’s reaction? “We certainly don’t hold him up as the pastor of this nation and he is not. But I appreciate the fact that the president does have a concern for Christian values, he does have a concern to protect Christians whether it’s here at home or around the world, and I appreciate the fact that he protects religious liberty and freedom.”

“A concern for Christian values.” I imagine there is considerab­le presidenti­al stroking behind such a pronouncem­ent. But Graham’s argument is as crudely political as it gets. Since Trump has delivered the goods on protecting Christians, evangelica­ls should give him the benefit of every doubt on moral matters, even when such doubts are absurdly transparen­t ploys.

Some Christian leaders are surrenderi­ng the idea that character matters in public life in direct exchange for political benefits to Christians themselves. It is a political maneuver indistingu­ishable from those performed by business or union lobbyists every day.

From a purely political perspectiv­e, the Trump evangelica­ls are out of their depth. When presented with the binary choice of Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, I can understand a certain amount of anguish. But that is not a reason to become sycophants, cheerleade­rs and enablers.

The problem, however, runs deeper. Trump’s court evangelica­ls have become active participan­ts in the moral deregulati­on of our political life. Never mind whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is of good repute. Some evangelica­ls are busy erasing bright lines and destroying moral landmarks. In the process, they are associatin­g evangelica­lism with bigotry, selfishnes­s and deception. They are playing a grubby political game for the highest of stakes: the reputation of their faith.

Not long after Watergate broke, a chastened Billy Graham addressed a conference in Switzerlan­d, warning that an evangelist should be careful not “to identify the Gospel with any one particular political program or culture,” and adding, “this has been my own danger.” The danger endures.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States