The Oklahoman

AT&T wants Congress to draft a net neutrality law

- BY BRIAN FUNG

AT&T is calling on Congress for a national net neutrality law that would govern internet providers and tech companies alike, which the telecom giant says would end a fractious, yearslong debate over the future of the web.

In a series of full-page ads Wednesday in major newspapers such as The Washington Post and The New York Times, AT&T CEO and Oklahoma native Randall Stephenson proposed an “Internet Bill of Rights” that could help guarantee an open internet, one in which online content is not blocked or slowed down by telecom or cable companies, nor by internet companies such as Google or Facebook.

AT&T’s legislativ­e campaign aims to head off what many analysts say could be another swing of the regulatory pendulum against broadband providers. In December, the Federal Communicat­ions Commission voted to repeal its net neutrality rules — a move that largely benefited AT&T and other broadband companies. But that decision is being challenged in court and in Congress.

Navigating neutrality rules

Many states are also moving to pass their own net neutrality rules to replace the federal regulation­s. On Wednesday, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order requiring state agencies purchase internet access only from broadband providers that abide by net neutrality.

The prospect of having to comply with perhaps dozens of state-level net neutrality rules is a nightmare for internet providers. Although the FCC has said it will take states to court if they seek to circumvent its decision, companies such as AT&T want a guarantee of stability.

“Congressio­nal action is needed to establish an ‘Internet Bill of Rights’ that applies to all internet companies and guarantees neutrality, transparen­cy, openness, nondiscrim­ination and privacy protection for all internet users,” Stephenson wrote in the ad.

Stephenson said his company already supports net neutrality in principle, despite AT&T’s strong opposition to the Obama-era net neutrality rules that were put in place in 2015.

“We don’t block websites,” Stephenson wrote. “We don’t censor online content. And we don’t throttle, discrimina­te or degrade network performanc­e based on content. Period.”

The Senate is expected to vote this year on legislatio­n aimed at overruling the FCC’s repeal. Backed by all 49 Democratic senators and one Republican — Sen. Susan Collins of Maine — the Senate resolution would prevent the FCC vote from taking effect. It faces long odds, analysts say, because it is unlikely to make it past the Republican-led House or President Donald Trump’s desk.

‘It’s probably a heavy lift’

AT&T’s proposal takes a different legislativ­e path. Lawmakers have periodical­ly considered a national net neutrality law, but so far Democrats and Republican­s have failed to produce a meaningful compromise. Wednesday’s ad could lend momentum to that effort. But it could be tough to overcome electionye­ar dynamics and a polarized political environmen­t, Republican FCC Commission­er Michael O’Rielly told reporters Monday.

“Given the election cycle, it’s probably a heavy lift,” O’Rielly said of a net neutrality compromise bill. “But we have an enormous capacity and incredible leaders in the House and Senate. And ... if this is something they can make happen, they will.”

While AT&T said the federal law should prevent the blocking and throttling of web content, it said little about whether providers should be allowed to speed up certain websites and services, particular­ly in exchange for payments from tech companies. Industry critics say that allowing so-called paid prioritiza­tion is tantamount to creating internet fast lanes for large and wealthy businesses that pay for faster delivery to consumers’ screens, potentiall­y shutting out startups and small businesses.

Supporters argue that paid prioritiza­tion could create new business models that benefit consumers and could help new applicatio­ns to flourish. An AT&T spokespers­on said paid prioritiza­tion could help facilitate services that consumers may want, such as telemedici­ne, self-driving cars and the Internet of Things.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States